Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I get tired of the fees charged for electronic transfers. It should be the other way around. Many places will tack on 3% if you use a credit card. Paypal is what, 1.5%? Wiring money is expensive, Western Union is even worse. Added up over a year, all those "convenience fees" and crap can be a hefty bill.

Checks still have zero transaction costs for me and the depositor. When people claim I didn't pay them, it's nice to show them the cancelled check with their signature on it.

When bargaining with someone, showing them a signed check made out to them can clinch the deal :-) Of course, cash is even more persuasive, but I don't care to carry around cash and again, I like having a cancelled check as a receipt.



I am not criticising you for using checks. As you rightly point out electronic transfers should be the no fee option - the idea that pushing around bits of handwritten paper is cheaper than electrons is crazy.


My bank wants me to use electronic billpay, but they want to charge for it. I say no thanks, you can keep dealing with my free paper checks which cost you more.

I've been using ATMs since 1979, and I picked a bank that did not charge for using it. It's just nuts to charge for an ATM when using their tellers for free costs them far more.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: