Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
DanWaterworth
on Aug 24, 2016
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Types
The question was, "how's that?". My answer was, it's possible for a small dependently typed language to be simpler than Haskell.
I'd already made the assertion that Idris was less complicated than Haskell.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
I'd already made the assertion that Idris was less complicated than Haskell.