Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There is an entire blog dedicated to the topic of tech at Airbnb: http://nerds.airbnb.com/. Perhaps you will still feel the same after reading this?

Peter Thiel's Zero To One described four pillars that were necessary for a monopoly. It appears Airbnb has most if not all of these.

1. Network effects - this is usually more important than proprietary tech. They have this - global network effect. This is not a "retail company" any more than Amazon's 3rd party marketplace or Alibaba's is.

2. Tech - read blog and decide for yourself. It's easy to imagine at sub-scale also being able to build Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc. Most of the challenges come at scale (and are protected by #1 above).

3. Brand - the commenters seem to agree they have this.

4. Economies of scale - they have this.



Why does everyone think that a competitor must be able to operate at the scale of Uber/Airbnb the day it's released? How many taxi commissions thought "oh no one can dethrone us, no one has 10,000 cars!"


Because I travel to paris one week and new york the other and seattle the other. If the listings aren't at all those places I discard the app and never use it again.


Uber does not have meaningful network effects. Airbnb does.

A competitor would need to be more than marginally better to compete subscale, as Airbnb was vs craigslist or original vrbo.


I agree with 1 and 3. 2 and especially 4 don't resonate. Would love to know how you describe 'economies of scale' at Airbnb




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: