Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your first paragraph is not really responding to what I actually said.

Let me repeat for you: these valuations are not above criticism. I just want to see better reasoning involved than literally balking at big numbers. It comes across as the same hysteria that drives the valuations up in the first place, just in the opposite direction.

It's really not a lot to ask to simply elevate the caliber of discussion. For example, I could respond to your second paragraph by stating that it is very difficult to claim what an objectively good valuation is without a understanding of what Airbnb's future plans are. Expedia's market cap is on the order of 17B. We have incomplete insight into Airbnb's plans for future markets.

See? That isn't so difficult. I'm not blindly attacking or defending the valuation, I'm reasoning about it instead of saying, "These numbers are big so I can't see how they possibly need them!"



Reasoning from whom? The interested parties won't tell the truth. In the cited period 1998-2001 Greenspan warned of "irrational exuberance", though he did not exactly do everything he could to stop the bubble either.

In reality, opinions from anonymous engineers who know what is being sold may be the best you can get.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: