I read it as: major libraries are reluctanly tolerated to break their API/ABI now and then. They are different beasts, whether you like it or not.
A colorary to the above is: libraries that break their API/AIB too early or too ofter never get a chance to earn the 'major' label in the first place.
You could also argue that a major library that abuses their privilege and breaks backwards compatibility beyond their "karma ballance" will be eventually forked or otherwise replaced by a more stable competitor. I am not sure if this idea holds water in the real world, but I really hope it does.