It's probably 400 sq ft, which is a 20x20 ft room. 52 sq ft would be really smal... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jeswin on Sept 20, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Death of the Party It's probably 400 sq ft, which is a 20x20 ft room. 52 sq ft would be really small.

jarvist on Sept 20, 2015 [–]

I suspect 16 m^2 --> 215 sq ft. (GP mistakenly multiplied by feet-in-metres rather than square-feet-in-square-metres conversion factor.)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact