I often tell startups if you have amazing revenue, that your startup might get a lower acquisition offer price because your acquirer doesn’t care about your revenue. They might just care about your tech.
People are allowed to evolve opinions. It seems to me he believes that a combination of transformer and program synthesis are key. The big unknown at the moment is how to do program search.
Absolutely. Presumably there is some specific considerations or evidence that helped him evolve his opinion. I would be interested in seeing a writeup about it. With him having been a very public advocate against AGI, a writeup of his evolution seems appropriate and would be very edifying for a lot of people.
I recall it as less an evolution and more a complete tonal shift the moment o3 was evaluated on ARC-AGI. I remember on Twitter Sam made some dumb post suggesting they had beaten the benchmark internally and Francois calling him out on his vagueposting. Soon as they publicly released the scores, it was like he was all-in on reasoning.
Which I have to admit I was kind of disappointed by.
In this context I believe it refers to models that are trained to generate an internal dialogue that is then fed back in as additional input. This cycle might be performed several times before generating the final output text.
This is in contrast to the way that GPT-2/3/“original 4” work, which is by repeatedly generating the next finalized token based on the full dialogue thus far.
Historically Apple used Apple Wireless Direct Link. Now it can communicate with the more open Wi-Fi Aware which is enabled on most modern Android devices and even ESP32
You can still do that if you want to. Most people don't.
Back before I got a cell phone, I had many many phone numbers memorized. Once I got a cell phone with a contacts list, I just stopped. Now I have my parents and my wife's phone numbers memorized, and that's it.
URLs are much the same. On most websites, if I can see the domain is the one that I expect to be on, that's all I really care about. There's a few pages that I interact with the URL directly, but it's a minority.
No they should not do this. They are trying to create generalized artificial intelligence not a specific one. Let the cursor, zed, codeium or some smaller company focus on that.
A marketing rule is that you cannot pick the same combination of colors as the incumbent product. Because looking at your website, I am thinking of DeScript all the time. So your website is now an ad for DeScript. This is why Pepsi cannot pick red and Xbox cannot pick Blue.
Congrats but please change the color if you want to compare yourself to DeScript.