This not an anti-Trump story. The story is about the DA and the police filing obviously wrongful felony charges.
Sure, a bigger number of protesters also got similar charges, but that's not a big news because it's everything but obvious that the charges are bogus.
With reporters covering the event the situation is different. Mass arrests during riots I fully understand, and then reporters may get caught up in the net, but after you identify the reporters, you let them go. You don't file felony charges against reporters filming the event, unless of course you are a crooked DA.
The workdays in Europe are your pretty typical 8 hour days, the difference I think comes from the 15-30 annual vacation days per year, plus all the public holidays.
This. Before I switched to 4 days a week (to do non-work stuff) I had 31 days holiday not including public holidays. I really value this extra time. The lack of holidays was one reason (albeit not the only one) I decided not to work in San Francisco when I had the chance in the past.
We liked cloth too, but it's a lot of laundry. We switched to disposable for the last child. I think it's more economical to use cloth diapers if you can afford the extra time it takes to manage them.
No other reason than that it systematically sucks at stopping malware campaigns compared to pretty much everyone else on independent third party comparisons such as https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/
The Nordics, where having kids also increases your happiness, are also very high on individualism as opposed to collectivism. The key difference to the US are the public policies that allow families never to stress about things like arranging daycare to the kids from the day they born.
These policies are not there to combat individualism, but to enable it with taxpaid support networks. Most of them are not poor aids, but state benefits that everyone enjoys, like the free or cheap high quality daycare used by the poor and rich alike.
How much more? I always imagined that it's more likely for a standard user to open every email attachment and execute it than it is to get targeted by a malicious attacker who knows what software your users are running and writes exploits tailored for them, but I could be wrong.
No tailoring required with something like this since it's worm-ready; blast out a ton of emails to seed the worm, then post exploit the worm emails itself to everyone in your address book. It won't take too long before a significant portion of the vulnerable systems win the world are infected.
See Blaster, Slammer, CodeRed for historical examples....
Typical AV for Linux is for server products serving mainly Windows clients, and the Windows clients are more probable to run random binaries.
Linux malware, outside of someone trying to crack the computer, largely doesn't exist because have you ever tried to ship binaries for all Linux distros?
Tor is supported by intelligence agencies because of the value it brings to them. For someone undercover, Tor is a great way to keep in touch, and if you're confronted you have a plausible explanation of wanting to buy LSD or watch kiddie porn or whatever most people use Tor for.
Didnt say DARPA was an intelligence front although it funds things for use by DOD mainly. NRL funded Tor for use by US military. State and CIA have numerous front organizations whose goal is to push propaganda into foreign countries to destabilize regimes. I see a notorious one on the page you listed: Radio Free Asia. Look up its backstory. They could've just wrote CIA-funded but tgen it was put under another propaganda organization claiming no CIA ties.
Given those propaganda groups and CIA affiliates are majority of its funding, it's strange to worry about a CIA person involved for project's "image." It's CIA & State funded for their use!
Far as supporting them, I totally agree and mentioned it in my main comment. Nothing wrong with taking money to do things of mutual benefit/interest.
Sure, a bigger number of protesters also got similar charges, but that's not a big news because it's everything but obvious that the charges are bogus.
With reporters covering the event the situation is different. Mass arrests during riots I fully understand, and then reporters may get caught up in the net, but after you identify the reporters, you let them go. You don't file felony charges against reporters filming the event, unless of course you are a crooked DA.