Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | winklock's commentslogin

The QUIC protocol draft states that it's not an acronym: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-16#sec...


The original creator of quick also explicitly named it as an acronym [0]. But of course, if the big boys at IETF decree it's not an acronym, it isn't. Just like we've always been at war with Oceanea.

[0] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqs...


Prescriptive language always falls apart from actual usage.


Well they are wrong then.


It adopted the same CoC as the Rust community.


You can replace anything transparently, the Redox kernel supports scheme namespacing.


So, for example, can I replace my network traffic with a file for testing, by binding a scheme to a file on disk?


To do that, you need to use a driver that translates between a file: and ip: (or ethernet:, tcp:/udp: or network:, allowing binding at different levels of the stack), because the protocols allow different operations. Said driver of course runs in userspace (because microkernel) and already exists. (Because it's absolutely needed for development.)


> driver that translates

That's something new... So, for the N-th device type in addition to the device driver I might need 2*(N-1) translating drivers!


Most of those would be meaningless, or require enough decisionmaking that the program between them cannot reasonably be called a driver. What kind of driver translates between audio and window system objects?

In any case, you only need 2N for translating both ways between file: and whatever: to get the same experience Unix does, and wherever that makes sense it is usually provided.

The win is of course that each of those protocols can be strongly typed and provide exactly all the operations that make sense for that protocol. Basically, think of all the things IOCTL does and give them their own names.


Ioctl was a horrible mistake, since it prevents configuring and introspecting devices with general interfaces and ad-hoc scripts.

This elevates the mistake, and polishes the worst of the early Unix conceptual fuckups.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: