Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more ttkari's commentslogin

Your project certainly looks very interesting! Any chance of another device with a smaller form factor sometime in the future? This one is huge :)


FWIW, the share of Swedish (the other official language) speakers in Finland is about 5%.


And the language is nevertheless recognized as one of the country's two official languages.

I just don't think Finland is a great example of what the post was talking about (a mythic country where everything works because it is an "ethnically homogenous high trust society" - although on reflection I'm not even sure what that all means). It's a way of lazily discounting what their government might or might not be achieving regarding homelessness, and it's not even true.

I'm not any sort of expert on Finland, but they have had some real political and social divides over the years and (I think?) nevertheless manage to care about the effectiveness of their welfare state. They'd appear to be a counterexample to the notion that everybody in a country needs to be the same in order for this stuff to work.


China still generates approximately two thirds of it's electricity by burning fossil fuels so it still has a plenty of catching up to do. For example in my country power generation is already 94% carbon free.


China backing off coal power plant approvals after 2022-23 surge - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41303635 - Aug 2024

China's total wind and solar capacity outstrips coal - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41220098 - Aug 2024

China is on track to reach its 2030 clean energy targets already - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41026542 - July 2024

China installing the wind / solar equivalent of 5 nuclear power stations a week - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40982276 - July 2024

China building two-thirds of world's wind and solar projects - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40940950 - July 2024

China's clean energy pushes coal to record-low 53% share of power in May 2024 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40935688 - July 2024

China's Batteries Are Now Cheap Enough to Power Huge Shifts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40919052 - July 2024

China is building more coal plants but might burn less coal - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39440374 - Feb 2024

Look at trajectories, think in systems. They are rapidly building a nation state clean energy electrical system, and when they're done domestically, these products will be exported globally.

The graphs on the below page might be helpful.

https://globalenergymonitor.org/report/china-continues-to-le...


I'm not sure the trajectory of PR matters much.

The actual generation trajectory seems more useful: https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/CHN


I think that page is telling a similar story to the PR:

"Primary energy production (percentage)" says 15% in Table 1 at the top, but I'm not sure how that's calculated - the whole table is as it seems to contradict the rest of the page:

- Generation by renewable sources has grown from 25% -> 40% from 2013 -> 2022 (Figure 5)

- 32 new nuclear power plants under construction in 2023 (Table 5)

- 49% of installed capacity in 2022 was renewables (Figure 6)


Electricity generation is what the grandparent was talking about, though the actual primary energy consumption of fossil fuels is more important w.r.t. climate change.

Primary energy production includes things like domestic coal production. Primary energy consumption includes things like gas consumption by cars, imports and distribution losses.


yeah but your article is about 2021 and 2022, and the point is this stuff is changing really fast especially in the past 2 years


Nuclear is much more important than wind and solar because it provides baseload and the plants last longer than 20 years.


I’m so tired explaining people what the capacity factor and baseload are and why wind and solar do not replace conventional power plants.

Germany has an installed solar capacity of 100 GW, 72 GW wind and some hydro and bio mass.

Yet there are 109 coal plants and 267 natural gas plants in Germany.

Comparing wind and solar with conventional power plants is completely pointless.


Unless you have a way of storing your power and replaying it when needed.


Like a lake that can maybe sustain 36GW of output for 10 hours.


I know it is a typo, but for other readers the figure in the article is 3.6 GW from 12 300 MW turbines, not 36 GW.


The best metric is CO2 reduction. Running fossil fuel plants for less time is a useful objective towards that.


Sure - all I'm saying is that they still have a whole lot of building to do, that's all. Reading the headlines it's sometimes easy to think that they're pretty much already there while the current production mix is not all that great yet.


There are two caveats to this. One is that a lot of it is due to work being outsourced to China (which allows for metrics like 94% carbon free) The other is it has a huge population so it's going to have high absolute numbers of everything good and bad.


Actually, what allows for "94% carbon free" is the production mix. In our case that would be nuclear at 42% share, hydro 19%, wind 18%, bio 13% - leaving only single digit percentage to coal, gas and oil.


But it doesn't account for embodied energy in imported products.


The initial statement was about power generation, not sure if it is of value to mention in this context all the other sources of carbon (of which imported products is one, but not the only one).


It's not typically included in the production figures. You only consider the emissions from production.


It's not typically considered, but it matters when comparing against an economy that primarily manufactures goods.


Finland is unfortunately a bit of an outlier. I wish the rest of the world would also double down on nuclear.


Nuclear requires an extremely mature bureaucracy to handle the serious longterm risks efficiently. Here in the USA I'm just not sure our government is mature enough for the task. Every 4 years we may have someone come in to slash safety regulations or erect impossible regulatory barriers, not to mention all of our defense treaty obligations and their churn. Every year (or less!) our congress may decide to let the government shutdown and stop paying critical contractors. Trains carrying spent or unspent fuel may derail thanks to inefficient regulation. etc etc.

One of the massive benefits of wind and solar is that it can be scaled down to a size even a consumer can deploy. This makes it relatively resilient to regulatory whims compared to massive undertakings like nuclear. I'm not a nuclear engineer, but I suspect the recent emphasis on smaller nuclear plants has more to do with navigating regulatory hurdles and uncertainty than efficiency.

All that to say I am quite jealous of countries with mature bureaucratic regimes that can efficiently manage nuclear!


> navigating regulatory hurdles and uncertainty than efficiency.

Yes, but also (theoretically-real) economies of scale.


China generates more renewable energy than the next highest 5 countries combined. It's nonsensical to compare them to most other countries.


Do you know how fractions and percentages work?


Do you know how scaling industrial processes works?


Renewable electricity hydro-electric dams don't really work like that. You can't "scale out", because you're limited by waterflow, reservoir area etc. There's a natural ceiling.


China's renewable energy is mostly solar.


They also make basically everything, so yeah, not sure what you expect. If America produced everything for the world, our fossil fuel usage would be through the roof as well.


You mean M.2 SATA storage is available cheaper than M.2 NVMe where you live? Over here there are very few options in M.2 SATA form factor and the prices are almost double that of M.2 NVMe, which is really not that suprising given the obviously very much higher volumes of NVMe parts.


Huh I just checked prices again and you are right. I must have remembered wrong. I stand corrected.


I'm daily driving a Sony Xperia 10 III with SailfishOS. It works as a phone, has a small selection of native apps available and runs many Android apps using LXC based solution called Android AppSupport. It's really not bad at all.


Sailfish licensing is unfortunate.

Unless you have one of their handful of (obsolete) blessed phones and pay them money for the privilege, you can't use their stuff.

I get that they're effectively a startup spun out of Nokia, and that they'd rather sell value than give it away. Still, non-Android Linux for touchscreens is in a sad state. Having one of the only options locked up where few people can try it and nobody can contribute to it makes the ecosystem worse.

There's gotta be a better solution to raise all the boats than get a handful of enthusiasts with old Sonys to pay them $30 each.


Until an update destroys android support and nobody can help (: (my state)


Sorry to hear that. If you are on one of the Xperias, you should be able to at least reflash the OS if nothing else really helps.


Genuinely interesting: what's the benefit of using a non-Android OS if you end up running Android apps anyway?


Instead of going all-in on Android, you get to choose the apps that are most important to you and otherwise minimize your exposure to the privacy-grab. For example, if you'd really prefer to avoid using Android but do want mobile banking on your phone, just get the app for that and skip everything else.

Personally I like having Linux on the phone a lot for other reasons as well. For example, last summer I was backpacking in North America for several weeks. At some point I realized that I'd really hate to lose the photos on the memory card of my DSLR. Instead of getting another card and hiding the first one somewhere "theft-proof" in my belongings, I just went to BestBuy, got a memory card reader, plugged that into the phone, mounted the memory card filesystem and rsynced the files home over my vpn - which is exactly what I would have done if I had my laptop with me. Sure, I probably could have figured out a way to achieve something similar on Android as well, but having all the familiar tools available made it so much easier.


You could probably have done something similar using Android with Termux, yes. I use rsync in Termux to move files to or from my phone all the time. Android is a complete mess when it comes to app permissions and the file system, so I would not dare to guess if it would be possible to access a USB drive from within Termux or not.

I preferred SailfishOS on my Jolla Phone (and my Jolla Tablet) as the experience is much better with how you can access files on the file system etc. But for various reasons (including a cracked phone screen) I went back to Android several years ago.


My current transfer fee is 0,03€/kWh. There is also the electricity tax (0,028€/kWh) and energy sales commission (0,004€/kWh). With hourly energy rate of -0,50€/kWh any usage will lower my energy bill for the current month even considering all the above costs.


Ah thanks. The rule of thumb "you don't earn" applies to "ordinary" negative energy prices caused by favorable weather. Obviously here the price was so extreme that old wisdoms no longer apply.

Myself I enjoy the comfort of a fixed rate contract. No efforts in trying to optimize consumption profile over days and weeks.


According to Finnish Energy Authority (energiavirasto.fi), at the end of 2022 only 13,7% of customers had a contract where pricing is tied to the hourly market rate. It is much more common to have either a fixed price contract (usually for a term of 12 or 24 months) or a contract where the pricing is set by for example monthly averages of the market price.


My mistake! Assumed all Nordic countries were the same


What a good time to heat up the sauna.


But the real time price will be very expensive, it depends how the consumer contract is written.


Most Finnish households have a contract which limits the effect of this pricing anomaly (fixed price contracts are quite popular as people see the hourly market rate as risky and unpredictable). However, I do have a hourly market rate based contract myself and tomorrow afternoon/evening with rates of -0,50€/kWh any electricity consumption is going to lower my energy bill - even considering the energy sale commission, taxes and energy transfer fees which I will of course have to pay.


What kind of tax is calculated on a negative rate?

Some flat fee?


There are two fixed fees households pay, an energy tax of 0,02253€/kWh and a security of supply fee (0,013 euro cents per kWh). These are not affected by fluctuations in the market prices of electricity.


> passenger vehicles are responsible for 61% of CO2 emissions in Europe

The EC disagrees with you on this one, quoting 12%. The share is nowhere near 61% even in the US.

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport-emissions/r...


Thank you for catching my typo, I have edited my comment. The citation for the stat is 3:45-3:51 on https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=360761996193121 (“Facebook live with Jan Huitema, European Parliment”).


The lady speaking is not Jan Huitema.

Jan Huitema is the other person on the live. IMO, I would not trust this as a source at all.

To each their own.


Alternate source:

https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-...

> Road transport constitutes the highest proportion of overall transport emissions — in 2020 it emitted 77% of all EU transport GHGs (including domestic transport and international bunkers).


> There's an option of overbuilding PV to fully accommodate cloudy days or the winter season

It would be interesting to see exactly what kind of overbuild would be required to "fully accommodate" for the winter season with PV in Finland.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: