I'm struggling with this right now. 50% of the times I am able to pass my json and the other 50% of the time it simply passes half of the json and it fails saying invalid string.
I have also worked on react agents using langgraph and I've not faced much issues! This thread has been confusing! Am I doing anything incorrectly? Or am I misunderstanding what people call as agents?
Almost certainly. I have seen cases where dev used AI to write a code which testers tested "using AI" and analysts used AI to parse the teat cases.
AI is very good to write the code which you already know how to write and you just handover your typing to the said AI.
I have begun using AI as an assistant basically to get the first draft and then optimization etc I do after the first block of code is written.
When people who don't know a language sufficiently enough use AI then it's a recipe for disaster. Teams will show metrics that wow 90% adoption of AI but juniors don't learn enough.
At least that's my experience. Very much interested in knowing if I can use AI more efficiently!
I write on paper first. Then I type on Apple Pages on my iPad using an external keyboard. Then I edit using the Pencil annotating the pdf with double line spacing.
Then edit again on ipad.
I recently discovered obsidian, which I plan to use for my next novel
Not to mention how people blame the board going "woke" whatever that term means and that the board is a diversity hire LOL
Also now that execs are being fired then people (including employees at other companies whom this doesn't affect even a single iota) are mad!!
Idk who formed the board of openai but if MSFT & G can layoff thousands despite esrning billions in revenue every quarter then the openai board also can fire the CEO if they think he is going against the charter.
What's more depressing is that people don't know that the non profit firm controls the for profit entity and they make things up to defend the fires CEO
It's all a weird thing. We can't have an opinion because we just don't know. We can just guess.
I know Europe isn't as anti climate change as US but I really hope rhat the world atarts taking this seriously
When Europe is as hot as Asia during summers and as hot as Asia during respective winters that clearly proves beyond a shadow of doubt that global warming is real
Because Trump had said "it is snowing here" to justify xlimate denying. They have extreme polar vortex over there so they haven't yet faced the severity of climate change, I think.
Sadly this is a global problem and no matter what tiny Switzerland does to be green, it has almost zero effect when the big polluters are still arguing if climate change is real.
This very much varies depending on where you are in Europe and who you are talking to. Much of Western Europe gets a climate that is warmer than the same latitude in the US because of the Gulf Stream. It's possible that climate change might disrupt that resulting in certain regions being _colder_.
In the meantime, the latitudes at which you can economically grow wine grapes are gradually moving northwards.
- Microstates/islands which have very inefficient generation
- and then Estonia is worse than the US, because it still has lots of Soviet-era coal generation.
Most of Europe has per-capita emissions about half those of the US, comparable to those of China. The US has bad emissions because of cheap petrol and over 200GW of coal fired power stations.
it was just an issue with your phrasing of 'anti climate change'. I think you meant 'climate change denying' or something like that, then it makes more sense. Being 'anti climate change' to me means that you try to stop the change, and by your comment I read it as the US being more advanced in that regard.
