Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | theNewMicrosoft's commentslogin

Bleach, the perfect anti-aging skin treatment.

"Inflammatory skin damage in mice blocked by bleach solution, study finds"

https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2013/11/inflammatory-...

"Long-Term Skin Safety Effect of Chlorine-Rich Water Treatment on C57BL/6 Mice"

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/11/7/1914

and here one study with humans this time that shows bleach baths failed (among other positive results) to nuke their dysbiotic skin microbiome

"Bleach baths enhance skin barrier, reduce itch but do not normalize skin dysbiosis in atopic dermatitis"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-023-02723-1


Another fork with SponsorBlock support plus a few extra video platforms is the bravenewpipe

https://github.com/bravenewpipe/NewPipe


Well, at least we still have Tokyo Game Show.


I heard that it was disastrous last year because of the heat in Tokyo. I hope it isn't killed by the climate change :-/

I went there once in my twenties and it was fun although exhausting. So many people, so long lines, but you can play "that" game.


Everything + EverythingToolbar

https://github.com/srwi/EverythingToolbar


I wanted that toolbar for a very long time, didn't know it now exists. Thanks for recommending. I have switched to https://github.com/dremin/RetroBar/ for a very a while now but this is very intriguing.


> Also, it doesn't have SLS, which I feel good about.

Fwiw, the jury is still out regarding SLS.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506142/


Anecdota: SLS always causes mouth sores aka canker sores for me. My inner cheeks and gums were covered in them before I figured it out. It was a very painful existence. Other people online reporting that cutting it out helped them saved me. I'm sure there are people who can tolerate SLS just fine, but I am not one of them, and the evidence has been clear cut enough for me that an inconclusive NIH study will do nothing to move the needle.

For anyone reading this suffering the same fate, benzocaine, which is commonly sold near the toothpastes, is an absolute lifesaver when you have a canker sore. It's sold under the name "Kanka" but any store brand alternatives should work just as well.



Add to that the high oxalate content in dark chocolate.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S08891...


True, and not that but they consume a lot of resources as-well

https://oofhours.com/2022/01/30/the-overhead-of-widgets-and-...


> My suspicion is that, when Pale Moon asks you not to use Web Components, they're doing so because their engine is old

Your suspicion is entirely wrong.

1: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=22270

2: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=22399


These are both basically MoonChild saying "it's not true" which doesn't change whether it's true.

MoonChild also told everybody that Let's Encrypt is a terrible idea, untrustworthy and nobody should use it. How did that end up?

I will give them props for actually doing it (plenty of people went "I'll just fork it" when Mozilla decided to change things but very few of them actually did all the resulting heavy lifting) not just talking about it. That's not nothing, but it doesn't make them right.


Neither of those really even contradict what smacktoward said, much less disprove it. In those posts, Moonchild disagrees with the idea that Pale Moon is "a rebranded rebuild of an old Firefox version" and more broadly that it corresponds to any particular Firefox version since there has been years of parallel development. He also affirms that Pale Moon has kept up with other browsers in security. It is entirely possible for all of that to be true and for smacktoward's suspicion — that Moonchild's primary problem with Web Components is that they work poorly in Pale Moon and it would be a lot of trouble to fix that — to be true.


> It is entirely possible for all of that to be true and for smacktoward's suspicion — that Moonchild's primary problem with Web Components is that they work poorly in Pale Moon and it would be a lot of trouble to fix that — to be true.

It is not true

for the simple fact that the next milestone release (v29) of pale moon will support WebComponents

> Neither of those really even contradict what smacktoward said, much less disprove it.

smacktoward repeats the same tired oversimplifications that PM is just "rebased itself on mainline Firefox circa Firefox 52" both my links prove that the above statement is fundamentally wrong.


> Your suspicion is entirely wrong.

In what way? Could someone summarize these sources?


>Animal protein is highly inflammatory. This is about the worst thing you can do if you are concerned about inflammation.

But not the worst thing you can do if you are concerned about having a healthy heart[1]

[1] https://asunow.asu.edu/20170317-discoveries-despite-meat-hea...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: