Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more syrrim's commentslogin

You need to configure it properly or pass the -u flag for it to support unicode I believe.


The data collection would also be illegal in the EU I presume.


An inch in aspect ratio is a relatively large change, considering it entails ~70% of an inch in both dimensions. It would be better to compare screen area or vertical and horizontal dimensions separately, to get a clear picture of the difference.


Yeah.

5.8" @ 17.4:9 (outer screen) = 13.73 sq in

7.6" @ 6:5 (inner screen) = 28.4 sq in

For comparison to the Pro

6.7" @ 19.5 = 17.08in sq in


Either the competitor has no ads and doesn't charge money, at which point it would bleed money, or it charges a fee, and hence would be even less successful than youtube.


Apple sells hardware and software/services, Microsoft sells primarily software and software services (surface aside). Hardware is the business of buying materials, improving them, and selling them at a premium. Software is the business of developing software, then selling it to as many people as you can. Software naturally lends itself to high margins. Hardware less so.


They cared enough to implement detection and blocking.


Which is the equivalent amount of engineering work to just bypassing sending telemetry on WINE if WINE is detected. Instead, they go out of their way to detect WINE, but then intentional block it, rather than just bypassing telemetry upon detection. Someone at Roblox has an axe to grind.


Afghanistan is a relatively poor, undeveloped country, yet they just demonstrated their sovereignty in your sense against the most capable country on earth. Of course, if the US wanted to they could have steamrolled afghanistan - but they didn't. What changed is that the willingness to destroy people in war evaporated, and so the ability in theory to conquer a country, and the willingness to do so given the costs it would entail diverged significantly. This might be particular to the west, and countries like china or russia don't care as much. But they are living in the world created by US hegemony, which in large part entails playing by the US' rules.


> What changed is that the willingness to destroy people in war evaporated, and so the ability in theory to conquer a country, and the willingness to do so given the costs it would entail diverged significantly. This might be particular to the west, and countries like china or russia don't care as much.

The USSR tried to invade and occupy Afghanistan too. Lasted less than 10 years despite being next door.


Correction: The US has never tried to occupy Afghanistan. So there is no "too".


Feels like you could make a case either way, like how "freedom fighters" or "resistance fighters" might be used for some groups vs "illegal combatants" for others... or even the same group at different times.

The US toppled the government and had troops stationed there for ~20 years.

I think depending on your political leanings you could reasonably frame that as a) police action and support for a fragile government, or b) an occupation propping up a puppet regime.


Occupation doesn’t always have a negative connotation in popular culture, e.g. the allied occupation of Germany after WWII. I don’t really see how Afghanistan wasn’t an occupation, regardless of whether one is for or against (also confused who could possibly be for it today).


Yeah I’ll buy that, Afghanistan is sovereign. Terrain matters! Switzerland may be as well.


They're presumably claiming that european devices will be less secure.


Or usability of this feature would be so frustrating, that no one will use. Constant security popups on every start, very limited available API for apps, etc...


There is law and there is the spirit of the law. The ECJ can be pretty fast when they feel someone is taking the piss.


The cookie popups can be very annoying and confusing and they didn't do anything about that.


Recently I've noticed more sites providing a visible "Deny All" button, rather than the dark pattern of going through and unchecking 5, 10, 50 tracking cookies individually, or having to dig out a button hidden somewhere.

I assume this was how it was intended to function, but the kind people that run internet websites intentionally made it more difficult.


Indeed, the bigger players were, I think, specifically contacted.

Lots of smaller players still do it, though, so maybe this is not the most effective enforcement style.


They have actually fined several large tracking providers for their shady cookie popups because opting out was harder than opting in.

European DPAs aren't getting enough funding to take on this problem, but they haven't been sitting still either.


They're slowly working through the backlog. Even Google gave in and put a single, working "deny all tracking" button front and center.


That would just give them a huge fine.


That's why Windows is beautiful, all APIs are open for developers to use for whatever they want.


Apple has full disk encryption across all their devices, no?


It's phrased as if it's an answer to a question, which it would be if it was the result of a prompt to chatgpt. Of course, a person could deliberately emulate that style as well, making this an unreliable way to determine whether a comment was written by a bot.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: