Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sigkill's commentslogin

It also sustains the bubble for a bit longer. I'm genuinely curious/anxious to see when and how the bubble bursts. It could end up being something seemingly trivial or random and completely illogical that finally topples the jenga tower.

> the bubble

> the jenga tower

I am not so sure about these narratives anymore.


Both bubble and Jenga tower are examples of unstable systems that can persist for an unexpectedly long time.

They're good analogies. It's possible to keep a Jenga tower going forever, just extremely difficult once it reaches the point of being all middle pieces.

It's certainly not possible to keep a Jenga Tower growing forever. For each floor you add you need to leave at least one piece in a lower floor. Eventually you run out of pieces. It's possible to "complete" a Jenga Tower, but at that point it has to stop growing.

But it doesn't, strictly speaking, have to stop going. The bottom floor could be removed and placed at the top.

Also easier if you can hold up bits of it with strings from the ceiling, which is what the EPA is doing for data centers here.

Do you look at the current setup and see stability? Or is the "jenga tower" already a pile of blocks on the ground.

I don't think it's a bubble

The dot com boom was a bubble. Doesn't mean that the underlying web technology that powered it was bad or worthless. But the valuations definitely were. AI, in its current form, will be around for a long time, maybe even as ubiquitous as the internet is today, a few decades from now. But the situation right now can definitely be classified as a bubble.

Consolidation. This happened with cars during the great depression. Lots of small factories were bought out by Ford and Chrysler.

It’s a bubble. “AI” could be quite successful at this point, and the economics still don’t work out.

The economics work out just fine. Their actual target business model is replace every knowledge worker. Their thought process is "look at all these people making 150k+, we can do their jobs for 10% of that, think how much money that would be if we had all of it"

Sure, the next step is complete regression to feudalism, but they aren't thinking that far ahead, they just want to take every job in existence that isn't physically turning a proverbial wrench.


the moment AI is capable enough to replace every knowledge worker and all knowledge workers are fired and/or dead the AI companies will just hike up the price for access to their bots until every company is paying at least as much if not more than what they were on human workers.

What even is the economy after they have killed all the workers and it's just bots clicking on each others ads?

Once the economics work out, the economy as a whole doesn't, therefore the economics DOESN'T WORK OUT.

I think you're making an assumption that the owners of this capital aren't: "That the economy has to work out for everyone."

It doesn't work out for the owners of the capital. Their wealth is entirely based on their claims on future production that is consumed by people with money.

Then it's on to centralization of the "human" components of the workforce into company towns, robot armies and competition for natural resources that will be processed from raw.

Rich people trading houses and shares to each other

You can't hike up the price on open-weight frontier models. It's a commodity.

This already happened btw

It’s wild to me that anyone can have that thought and yet not think about what happens to everyone whose job you took. Especially in a country with citizens known for owning guns.

Especially after seeing what the “learn to code” movement has brought people into, I can’t imagine those people will just roll over and peacefully enter homeless encampments..


>citizens known for owning guns.

They're largely the ones voting for this.


I’m old enough to remember when people said computers would do all jobs 30 years ago

They said it every decade since invention. My father who worked in IT since the 60s told me to become an electrician when I was kid as computers will replace all jobs soon. I did become an electrician, welder and have two doctorates; math and cs (which was part of the math dep then). But this time does feel actually different; cheap LLMs are good enough to do advanced work, better than most colleagues I worked with over the decades. Sure you need humans still, just not many. Robots are crap still mostly but we are just starting out… I will not have to worry in my lifetime, but if I had kids or grandkids, I would be worried. But I guess all generations, like my father, have that anyway; we will see.

Individuals with guns defending against a modern military with drones and tanks is a fantasy.

I don’t think it’d get to that point but maybe. I’m imagining more events like Luigi (not condoning violence just equating situations)

Like a bunch of guys with guns couldn't defeat the well drilled and maintained British regulars that are backed by massive warships. Or a bunch of dudes with guns in the jungles of Vietnam couldn't beat a modern military with fighters and bombers and tanks. Or a bunch of dudes in the mountain wilderness with guns couldn't beat a modern military with satellites, smart missiles, night vision and drones

Or a bunch of dudes in the deserts of yemen couldn't defend against a modern military with aircraft carriers, realtime control of almost all communications, autonomous drones and missiles and 5th gen fighters

History and current events seem to be disagreeing with you.


This is laughably uninformed for what the goals are of those conflicts.

Suppression of populace is vastly different than "trying to beat terrorism" or end resistance in a jungle.

Go take a look at actutal comparable environments, like china, or north korea for how well that goes for the dissenters


> Especially in a country with citizens known for owning guns.

This has always been a story Americans tell themselves to sleep better at night that has zero relation to reality.

The US is a country that has seen many injustices perpetrated by the government. From concentration camps for people of a certain descent to legal racial discrimination (and slavery before that) to wanton violence by security forces against innocent people (pick your favourite police/ICE/etc murder here).

When have armed Americans ever risen up against a government injustice? Best I can think of is the Oklahoma city bombing and I'm pretty sure that's not what you're all refering to.


This doesn't make any sense. Americans wield guns against the government literally every day. Usually it's not very widespread or organized, but sometimes it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rebellions_in_the_Unit...

Your list is embarrassing. Since 1973 (I'm not going further back because the recent examples are too bad to bother), there have been:

* 2 land disputes between federal land management and individuals that thought they deserve more rights over federal land. Hardly fighting against an injustice here, were they

* The BLM protests/unrest started by the murder of George Floyd. I don't recall Americans taking up arms against murderous cops, or anyone, really. The closest to arms taking I can remember is an underage guy going to a protest to "protect" against rioters, getting attacked and killing people in response. Hardly anyone fighting against government instilled injustice with their right to bear arms, is it?

* January 6, where a bunch of mentally challenged individuals tried to overturn the election results at the request of the loser of that election. There was no injustice done against the people in question, and they didn't use their arms against it, they just stormed a barely defended building. One of the shittiest coup attempts of all time, and if anything, for furthering injustice and government overreach than anything else.

So no.


Your fixation on "injustice" makes your point unfalsifiable. Any rebellion could be construed as righteous or treasonous. The point is that people really do take up arms against the govt all the time, and that fact has historically had major effects on the conduct of police and politicians

> Your fixation on "injustice" makes your point unfalsifiable

My point is that nobody stands up with arms against injustice in the US.

> The point is that people really do take up arms against the govt all the time

6 times in 50 years, half of which didn't involve any arms? "All the time" might be a stretch.

> that fact has historically had major effects on the conduct of police and politicians

Yes, police have stopped murdering innocent people. Right?


I mean, Luigi did, no? If we are to believe the narrative that he is who did it.

Hunger and desperation are really powerful motivators. And violence and rioting are basically socially transmitted diseases.

You don't need everyone to wake up someday and think "Hey, I think those Jacobins in France had a good point" to have a revolution. You only need a few detonators.

If the societal conditions are ready, nobody can really stop the masses once they are ignited.


This is a country that voted for Trump twice soooo... it's anybodies guess.

> Sure, the next step is complete regression to feudalism, but they aren't thinking that far ahead,

They are though! They are literally building castles for themselves already.


You can't be a feudal lord if you're forced to accept razor-thin margins (assuming they're positive at all) due to relentless competition

Even your back of napkin optimistic math doesn't work.

The median white collar job in the US (picking it on purpose because it's a country with high wages, your math would be even worse in a France or Italy) is in the $60-70k. Yes you have to add benefits and etc, but we're still pretty far off 150k.

How much tokens does $80k buy you and do you think it's capable of replacing a human's output? For some, definitely. For plenty, I doubt it. Currently token costs are subsidised by the bubble frontier labs and already we're seeing tightening of budgets because it's costing more than expected


I think you never worked with ‘plenty’; most people I worked with in the past 40 years in IT I am suprised when they actually can walk in on their own. I would say most can be replaced by deepseek flash now, let alone Astra or Fable. I never know in what heaven HN people work, but my company is doing some fixing for a multinational with 20k ‘devs’, most outsourced and they are quite literally morons, far behind even bad LLMs. Their trick is basically to schedule as many calls with as many people as possible to look busy and make their timesheets somewhat plausible. And these are mostly devs. When you see the questions to jira tasks you worry about if they don’t forget to eat or go to the toilet randomly. Oh yeah, most are classified as seniors. An we visit many companies like this. So I am definitely confused how people on HN seem to think most humans can do something worthwhile.

But they haven't replaced every knowledge worker. The unemployment rate remains unaffected by all the AI progress. At some point the bill comes due, and if most of those jobs are still around, then what?

Parts of it can be a bubble while other parts are not. The need for datacenters can be real while the valuation of model providers can be a fantasy.

If the need is driven by a bubble economy, when the bubble pops the demand disappears too. This can even lead to a separate bubble popping (see: the dotcom and telecom bubbles).

Yes, datacentres can be reused for other purposes but dark fibre didn't save the telecom bubble and the utility of train tracks didn't save the railway bubble.


well, according to finance bros, shovelling cash into a furnace to power a boiler to steam some eggs is considered a wild success. Economics is for normies.

This sounds like Google+'s circles.


I appreciate your observation. What point are you trying to convey?


> the goal was they had to weasel the phrase in somehow

Reminds me of the old short story, I think it was called "The Club"?


That makes me think - in ML we use output and inputs to influence internal state...


For some reason, every thing is a video game to me, so I'm always trying to "pathfind" different routes, and calculate... for the lack of better word, weights each road has at different times of the day. Makes it pretty quick to remember them. Regardless of where or how I am, I'm mentally always aware of what approximate direction North is.


At a certain point, we need to start piercing the corporate veil and hold people accountable.


The term of art “pierce the corporate veil” literally exists because we already do this.


Do we, though?


Good luck charging back a card-present transaction after a week.


I have successfully charged back a card-present transaction after multiple months with US Bank.


Was it a chargeback (i.e. a fraudulent transaction) or services not rendered (i.e. faulty product etc.).


Services not rendered and it was based on a bait and switch with a rental company. I had to send in documentation and receipts but I got my money back in the end.


I mean, at this point, might as well just 3d print a moveable type...


I presume that the internal sd card would help the longevity of the device as well. Like someone mentioned, they upgraded their storage. You could do the same thing, if after say 5-7 years, the card starts degrading and the reader starts slowing down.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: