Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more ralusek's commentslogin

YouTube shorts now eat up like 2/3 of my UI. I hate them.


I think that Thiel would actually like this. Both because it's progress in the "world of atoms," as he says, but also because it's "blood boy" adjacent.


> since I only use AI for issues/problems I don't understand

I only use [coding assistants] for problems I DO understand.


I woke up, didn't focus on self care, didn't take medication, and got fired immediately. That doesn't feel very realistic


I work on a kiosk (MedifriendRx) which, to some degree "replaces" pharmacists and pharmacy staff.

The kiosk is placed inside of a clinic/hospital setting, and rather than driving to the pharmacy, you pick up your medications at the kiosk.

Pharmacists are currently still very involved in the process, but it's not necessarily for any technical reason. For example, new prescriptions are (by most states' boards of pharmacies) required to have a consultation between a pharmacist and a patient. So the kiosk has to facilitate a video call with a pharmacist using our portal. Mind you, this means the pharmacist could work from home, or could queue up tons of consultations back to back in a way that would allow one pharmacist to do the work of 5-10 working at a pharmacy, but they're still required in the mix.

Another thing we need to do for regulatory purposes is when we're indexing the medication in the kiosk, the kiosk has to capture images of the bottles as they're stocked. After the kiosk applies a patient label, we then have to take another round of images. Once this happens, this will populate in the pharmacist portal, and a pharmacist is required to take a look at both sets of images and approve or reject the container. Again, they're able to do this all very quickly and remotely, but they're still required by law to do this.

TL;DR I make an automated dispensing kiosk that could "replace" pharmacists, but for the time being, they're legally required to be involved at multiple steps in the process. To what degree this is a transitory period while technology establishes a reputation for itself as reliable, and to what degree this is simply a persistent fixture of "cover your ass" that will continue indefinitely, I cannot say.


Pharmacists are not going to be replaced, their jobs like most other jobs touched by AI will evolve, possibly shrink in demand but won't completely dissapear. AI is a tool that some professional has to use after all.


I JUST had a very intense dream that there was a catastrophic event that set humanity back massively, to the point that the internet was nonexistent and our laptops suddenly became priceless. The first thought I had was absolutely hating myself for not bothering to download a local LLM. A local LLM at the level of qwen is enough to massively jump start civilization.


Yeah bring Qwen and OSS-120b for sure. You’re going to want some solar panels with usb-c output tho


> incoming president of Oxford Union

> debated Kirk [at Oxford]

> cheered assassination of Kirk, which happened within months of debate

Is this really dragging American culture war into things? This is clearly relevant to Oxford


Anyone logical knows it’s relevant, but people putting their head in the sand about the most significant political assassination in over 50 years isn’t a surprise.


speedrun when?


If a robot costs $50k, lasts 5 years, and does the dishes and laundry every day, I'd consider it.


Isn’t that the dishwasher and the washing machine?


Why should it be progressive if it's not even scarce there? Why are you trying to punish people unnecessarily?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: