Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | powerbroker's commentslogin

That movie with "I know Kung Fu" -- we do that too.


Oh wait, I meant also "... over considerably longer timescales". (Minor technicality).


I Robot?


The Naked Gun (2025). It follows the pattern of past classic spoof films by having a serious(ish) plot that all the jokes are layered into.


Did they remake/reboot iRobot? That thing is so old, Will Smith was still relevant enough to be casted for it


Naked Gun, I assume


The vehicle, so evil, that it cannot be named. Life imitates art, and not in a good way.


Liberals are incredibly gullible.


As both a lawyer and a programmer, I tend to agree with the above. However, I've noticed among other lawyer/programmers, some further traits: easily bored, and extraordinarily focussed.

A quirky features of lawyers: can be unusually petty.

Quirky features of programmers: can be remarkably correct and still be very opaque.


I was driving the Model X a few years ago and ended up T-boning a minivan at ~45 MPH. Minivan rolled over. Our airbags deployed. Post accident, I discovered my glasses remained on my face and it seemed that the airbag did not even reach my body -- with the webbing taking the bulk of the impact. Car took months to repair and ~$30,000.

Not bad when you consider we were driving to the hospital at the time, and the accident prevented us from reaching the hospital as well as preventing us from calling on an ambulance.

3 'assists' that the car gave us:

1. Crumple zone is bigger;

2. Battery made our vehicle heavier;

3. (speculatively), the 'crumple parts', crumpled more and costed more -- leading to less (none) bodily injury.


The Model S and Model X were the first two vehicles to get 5 star crash safety in every category from the US and the EU. Supposedly broke the testing machines (leading to Elon saying 5+ stars)

They are among the safest cars on the road.


> They are among the safest cars on the road.

Though that needs a bit of salt for very heavy cars since they makes the occupants safer and everyone else less safe.

Still pretty good overall, but not ideal.


I remember that when the release versions about 10 years came on the market, but I have not heard those claims in quite a while from any credible sources.

I am certainly not authoritative. My vague recollection is that offset crashes Tesla didn't do quite as well at, so since then Tesla's ironclad safety rating has since waned


I bet Volvo had it first, not tesla. And now any new expensive car has 5 star safety rating thanks to progress in car design and EU laws.


Tesla had it first.

There are still extremely few vehicles that have five stars in every single category and sub category in both the us and eu.

The cyber truck is the first Tesla vehicle that doesn’t.


This is one reason why I got a cybertruck. Tesla safety, now with even better protection! There are some crash test videos of a cybertruck getting T-boned by a metal sled at near highway speeds. Ever since seeing those, we always drive the kids around in the truck.

Main downside is the hostile behavior from the public, but it’s a small price to pay.


You might consider getting an APC next?

Might be possible to run over smaller cars without even noticing it, let alone pedestrians.


If someone made an electric one with self driving I’d consider it!

Not for the running over of others, of course. That wouldn’t be very nice.


>Supposedly broke the testing machines

That doesn't sound like a good thing at all? Then again, I'm hardly surprised that the guy who tried to build an aluminum tank and sell it as a car would claim it is.


As the story goes, the machine that broke is a press that is supposed to crush the car roof.

The car roof withstood the pressure, the press did not. It's supposed to happen the other way around.


Sorry how is this story relevant to the article?


ditto.


1. I've paid electric bills in four different cities. Rates haven't been increased at more than 1x annually in any of them.

2. California is getting what seems to be two overhauls: a) replacing/upgrading lines and vegetation practices to harden them against sparking fires; b) massive electrification of cars, data centers, appliances. The capex has to be paid somehow... and interest rates are a drag to that.


> Rates haven't been increased at more than 1x annually in any of them.

Do you mean 2x?

> California is getting what seems to be two overhauls

I believe large share of rate increase is because PG&E need to pay multibillion penalty for previous years of negligence which caused multiple fires with casualties.


When talking about increases, usually you're talking about the increase by itself.

So if the total bill doubles from last pay period period, it is said that it has _increased_ 1x.


it increased by 100%, not 1x.


No, they're literally the same thing.


> it is said that it has _increased_ 1x.

my experience is that people say it increased 2x times. You can say it increased by 100%.


They're part of the wildfire fund so hopefully it's not all that.

https://www.cawildfirefund.com/participating-utility-compani...


that's safety improvement 5B fund, but there are also damage payments for 25.5B: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/judge-oks-nearly-25-bill...


This would improve efficiency if the number of electric vehicles on the U.S. roads was on a downward trajectory as they were in the early 1900s. But now the technology is quite different than the lead-acid used back then, and broadly accepted standards are in place. Moreover, the proportion of EVs to ICE vehicles has been growing, albeit more slowly, of late, but growing nevertheless.

That said, removing infrastructure for a growing portion of the fleet seems an odd choice.

Taking a more utilitarian approach, however, where the highest priority is to reduce federal spending, then this can make sense.

  1. Must reduce spending;
  2. Must reduce perks and credit cards among the U.S. employed workers;
  3. Parking is a necessity if we are to avoid WFH... and improve productivity;
  4. Giving free 'perk' to one group, without giving it to another, is a) unfair; b) costly.
  5. Therefore, remove the discriminatory perk, and satisfy goal #1.


A signal that an AI is better than a 5 year old is being able to respond to the following query: "What are your terms and conditions?".

For now, it is failing.


I have broken a collarbone; gotten a bruise 18 inches long; destroyed (one at a time) almost every part on my bicycle; hit an armadillo and ridden to 90 miles with a 20 mile head-wind in the final 10 miles. I've been happy pretty much every time even through some of these incidents, often because I had other riders with me.

I don't intend to live forever.


I totally get that. I played soccer. The exercise was incidental to my need to play with my friends and team-mates. When Father Time finally forced me to quit I had to go on anti-depressants. Soccer was my drug.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: