It say something about how useful is it when it is not subsidiced.

The bubble exists be cause no AI company gets any profits and laughable revenue.

Is it 2000$/month useful is the interesting question.

Fallacy: Appeal to authority.

How did you measure this "a lot more of my time", please share your results and methodology!

It is not worth it and it is not even that impressive considering the cost.

If you told me that you would spend half a trillion and the best minds on reading the whole internet, then with some statistical innovation try to guess the probable output of an input. The way it works now seems about right, probably a bit disappointing even.

I would also say, it seems cool and you could do that, but why would you? At least when the training is done it is cheap to use right? No!? What the actual fuck!

How did you measure this skyrocketed productivity? Please share your results and methodology!

Aggreed

Hyperbole

What's hyperbolic, that protein folding is solved, or that it's going to be significant?

Why use a word that you have to redefine the meaning of? The answer is to deceive.

There is no such thing as confidence regarding the actual facts, only confidence in probable output from the input. Factual confidence is impossible with current architecture.

Correct, it is a useless term with the goal to gaslight and antropmorphise a system that predicts the next token.