“When jump getting over a wall, you SHOULD use three points of contact.”

For most cases you should use three points of contact. However, there may be other situations for example if someone is giving you a leg up, or you can pole vault, where another solution is preferred.

Edit: hrm, I did paste a real link not sure where the undefined came from. This has happened twice this morning.

I thought this book had come out a decade ago - it's focused on AI, decentralized networks, computer vision, human in the loop, digital currencies, etc. and was about to praise it for being 10 years ahead of it's time.

It's *twenty* years ahead of it's time. Well done Daniel Suarez.

Edit: damnit I messed up the submission

:o - but the novel is awesome! Recommended for sure!

proper link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(novel)

Fixed it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46980940

Dang maybe fix the link?

Oh. I have the exact opposite feeling. I'm not into cars but I love this.

This is precisely why it's the right design for an Apple car and probably the wrong design for a Ferrari.

I knew someone who allegedly worked on the Special Project after a successful career at more familiar premium automotive brands. He was expressing exasperation with the process and said "I don't get why they're letting people who don't like cars design one. You wouldn't send your kids to a school full of teachers that hate children!"

I love cars and absolutely love this interior. It's retro-modern and has clear inspiration from Ferraris of the 80's and 90's. Ferrari's interior in the past few models (296, Roma) was absolutely atrocious, and this is a big step up.

My fear is that it’s the most attractive part of the car design :-)

That’s likely due to Albanese constantly indulging in bizarre racist conspiracy theories.

I’ve said this before on hating news but the best movie that stands up is sneakers.

Just imagine somebody has invented a quantum computer with a production process that has a very high error rate so a second one can’t be easily produced.

> it should be easy for X to regulate it themselves like the competition does but they don't

Yes they do regulate it. But then people find exploits just like the competition.

I don't think that's a candid description of how X handled this.

I don’t think saying other people aren’t candid is polite or advances the conversation.

Just calling out the false equivalence (Grok self-regulation: dragging their feet and doing the absolute minimum too late after deflecting all blame on the users, while the competition proactively tries to harden the models against such use)

Grok's always proactively had limits on adult content frm the day it was first released public. There's equivalence, you're stating that it's false but I haven't seen any reason to think that. I'm calling out the hypocrisy.