Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | motdiem's commentslogin

Anecdotally, I’ve received a few data requests from customers powered by it, and it was very easy to handle on our side - at most a couple of e-mail back and forth, and the customers seemed happy


You may be interested in sutom https://sutom.nocle.fr a hybrid wordle/motus for French that recently popped up


Just chiming in as a happy user of 33mail - congratulations and I'm happy to know that it is sustainable and growing.

One suggestion would be to better advertise new features to existing users - I was going to suggest adding 2FA authentication, and went for a quick check on my account, and it was already available :-)


Thank you for using 33mail - and for the suggestion.

We try to walk the line between keeping users informed of new features without defeating the purpose of 33mail by sending emails they don't want.

About how often would you be happy to receive emails about new 33mail features? A few times per year - perhaps?


Very interesting article - I wasn’t familiar with wardley maps and found [1] as a good starting point to explore their usage

[1] https://wardley-maps-community.github.io/awesome-wardley-map...


My understanding is keeping the deletion requests fullfills a legitimate business interest, so no -I would not delete the request. What we do is we keep those in a separate system, since the user records themselves (in my app, crm, etc) would be removed. That system is also how we "prove" that we executed the deletion requests in a timely manner


This all depends on what the legal basis for you processing personal data is in the first place.

There are several possible legal bases for processing personal data and legitimate interests is one; if legitimate interests wasn't your reason for processing personal data in the first place, then you couldn't rely on it later.

If legitimate interests were the basis for your processing, and a person requested their data be deleted, you have to be able to demonstrate that your legitimate interest overrides their rights. You should probably also demonstrate there aren't other steps you could reasonably take, eg partially deleting or anonymising the data.


The main downside is you have to be super careful when applying os updates - and recent macos tend to be updated more frequently.


Snopes[0] rates this as sort-of, but probably not the main reason

[0] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/railroad-gauge-chariots/


In the finer print it rates it as, “Partly true, but for trivial and unremarkable reasons.”



> a company that has a monthly cost ($250) for 4k words worth of blog posts

can you share the name ? This sounds interesting



Same for me - it was fine when looking for touristy stuff, restaurants opening hours and things like that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: