Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mateus1's commentslogin

I think the word "censorship" applies here.


He wouldn't be reinstated if it was censorship. The government didn't back down, just Disney did. This just shows Disney wasn't forced to remove him as some thought, they cancelled his show willingly so could take it back.


The gov openly pressured Disney to drop him -- that's what censorship is.

The fact that Disney reversed course (based on whatever internal calculations we don't know) doesn't mean it wasn't censorship to begin with.


> These investors almost certainly aren't insane or stupid.

I'm sure this exact sentence was said before every bubble burst.


Most investors I've heard talk about the AI bubble have mentioned exactly that they know it is a bubble. They are just playing the game, because there is money to be made before that bubble bursts. And additionally, there is real value in these companies.

I would assume the majority of investors in AI are playing a game of estimating how much more these AI valuations can run before crashing, and whether that crash will matter in the long-run if the growth of these companies lives up to their estimates.


That sounds very cynical and knowing which is obviously great, but not super interesting. Do you think the investors are insane or stupid? Do you think this is a bubble and that it's about to burst? I'm interested to know why.


MIT spinoff Google-owned Boston Dynamics pledged not to militarize their robots. Which is very hard to believe given they're backed by DARPA, the DoD/Military investment arm.


This pledge would last five seconds in an actual conflict, if it makes it even that far.


Militarize is just bad marketing. Call them cleaning machines and put them to work on dirty things.


Was owned by Google. Then Softbank. Now Hyundai.


It's direct wealth transfer to his supporters, paid by opponents and people who can't play the market...


Whisky is now officially on the rocks…


This guy advocates for 0 sugar intake, which seems like a very fringe opinion…


I prefer fringe than stupid.


You don’t think seeing ads around the city reduces the awareness for these things? If do, you’re arguing all advertising is useless…


You don’t value the city being cleaner? I live here and the city looks absolutely so much better. For one it has a lot less visual pollution and you can drive with less distractions… That alone justifies everything else for me.


The takeaway from the X-poster being "it's good that they're using LLMs" is hilarious. Why praise the method if the end result is so bad?


Perfection is just a bugfix away /s


That doesn’t hold water if you’re talking about uninhabited Antarctica territories.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: