Yep, every SLA I've ever seen only offers credit. The idea that providers are incentivized to fudge uptime % due to SLAs makes no sense to me. Reputation and marketing maybe, but not SLAs.

The compensation is peanuts. $137 off a $10,000 bill for 10 hours of downtime, or 98.68% uptime in a month, is well within the profit margins.

It's not a transitive dependency, it's just literally bundled into nextjs, I'm guessing to avoid issues with fragile builds.

Gitkraken is the best, and I can't believe anyone would voluntarily use Sourcetree over it.

I've used gitkraken for over 9 years and it's great for both newbies and pros.

It completely solves the problem with new or intermediate devs, who are not used to working in a sizable team, constantly needing hand-holding.

Lots of people resist adopting it at first, but not one has regretted it so far. It usually goes like this:

1. "No I won't use it, the terminal is better"

2. Mess up

3. Finally give gitkraken a serious try

4. Realize they didn't really know git

GitHub has both webhooks and an extensive API. What you are describing is entirely doable, nothing really requires GitHub Actions as far as I know.

Most people opt for it for convenience. There's a balance you can strike between all the yaml and shared actions, and running your own scripts.

They must have not asked enough Leetcode Hard questions in interviews.

The mod_pagespeed filter "prioritize_critical_css" was released exactly 12 years ago in early May 2013. At least 3 more popular critical css tools were released the following year, integrating with Grunt, Gulp, and later Webpack.

It's a bit like the <center> tag. A codebase that's littered with stuff like "InlineStack" is harder to work with and parse because the resulting div soup still requires extra styling, which is now both markup and CSS.

Why is it harder to work with? It makes it immediately obvious what the visual layout is and what the purpose of the component is and a lot of time all you want to do is have a flex on a component and you don't need other CSS to warrant yet another CSS class. It's the same reason why utility CSS was created (eg <div class="flex">). It also saves you from having to come up with a semantic name in your CSS for every wrapper.

Compare the following:

    <Stack gap={2} direction="row">
       <Box>
         <Avatar />
       </Box>
       <Box>
         <Button />
       </Box>
    </Stack>

    -----

    <MyCustomWrapper>
        <InnerChild>
          <Avatar>
        </InnerChild>
        <InnerChild>
           <Button />
        </InnerChild>
     </MyCustomWrapper>

I think this looks way simpler

  <div className=“flex gap-2”>
   <Button/>
   <Avatar/>
  <\div>

Then just apply the box styles using *: selector or directly in the component

React was literally first created in ML out of the author's dislike of MVC, who preferred functional programming and immutability[0]. For a long time, react aspired for its future to be in ReasonML.

Hooks came as no surprise to anyone who paid attention, as the recommended way to write components since at least 2016 was in the stateless functional style whenever possible, and many of us used recompose[1] to simulate hooks long before their introduction.

[0] https://github.com/reactiflux/q-and-a/blob/master/jordan-wal...

[1] https://github.com/acdlite/recompose

Maybe I was not paying attention, this is of course a possibility, but until at least early 2019 the react website's main page was only mentioning the class-based "stateful component" as the way to write components.

https://web.archive.org/web/20190105060636/https://reactjs.o...

Although they were mentioning function components at the time in the documentation, I can't say how mainstream that was. Hooks were introduced in Feb. 2019.

> North Korea didn't fire a single missile

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_Korean_missile...

> Russia didn't invade Ukraine

Russia invaded in 2014 and the conflict stabilized (but didn't stop) in 2015.

In the meantime, the Syrian civil war was raging on.

Similarly, if we ignore all the events in the prelude to WW2, the world was a very peaceful place. According to Hoover, Roosevelt was a threat to world peace, not Hitler.

I'm not implying anything with the analogy, I'm only trying to illustrate that the world was not peaceful between 2016 and 2020, despite the president's efforts.

Perhaps if we had gotten 2 consecutive terms, it might have provided more long term stability.

The crew had 13 hours of oxygen supply for two pilots.

The supplemental oxygen system was recharged just before this flight as well, so it was at maximum capacity.