Harder is not always better.

There's more to it like how to pick the weight, etc... but the perfect rep piece I really enjoyed.

Also late to the party, but creatine is the body and more importantly the brains friend too.

The filtering you describe is trivial with COUNT(flag IN (...) AND state=...) etc.

If you want to retrieve data on the last comment, as opposed to an aggregate function of all comments, you can do that with window functions (or with JOIN LATERAL for something idiomatic specifically to Postgres).

Learning how to do JOIN's in SQL is like learning pointers in C -- in that it's a basic building block of the language. Learning window functions is like learning loops. These are just programming basics.

For anything that isn't just a basic row lookup from a single table, you should really just be writing the SQL yourself.

I did not know what "NVR" meant prior to reading the OP.

With the author's blessing, I took the doc's content and converted into into a more usable website: https://lastofus.posix.love

Would love to hear feedback if anyone has any!

Is it possible to get that headless Chrome browser + agent working locally? With something like Cursor?

    # Stream responses in real-time
    chat.ask "Tell me a story about a Ruby programmer" do |chunk|
      print chunk.content
    end

Concurrency support is missing from the language syntax and this particular library as a concept. This is by design, to not distract from beautiful code. Your request will make zero progress and take up memory while waiting for the LLM answer. Other threads might make progress on other requests, but in real world deployments this will be a handful (<10). This server will get 10s of requests per second when something written in JS or Go will get many 1000s.

It’s amazing how the Ruby community argues against their own docs and doesn’t acknowledge the design choices their language creators have made.

Say I am eating well, exercising consistently, getting enough sleep.

For a male in his 40s, what are the best bang-for-the-buck ways to detect cancer before it becomes life-threatening?

The Galleri blood test screens for a range of cancers (sensitivity varies by cancer) and is ~$900, although you need a doctor to order it. You also may not technically be within the intended use population unless you have some risk factors (e.g. you are older than 50, or have family history of cancer).

Colonoscopy is a good idea, given the rising rates of colon cancer among younger adults.

The 'paradox' of genuinely higher survival rates with early detection is explained by the fact that the survival rates are measured from the time of diagnosis. If a person with undiagnosed cancer is diagnosed after 7 years with said cancer, and then dies the following year, then he is considered to have had 1 year of survival. By contrast if somebody is diagnosed at year 1 and then dies 7 years later from the cancer, then they are considered to have 7 years of survival. They lived exactly the same length with cancer, but the survival times after diagnoses are markedly different.

This applies for most cancers. In my prior readings on this topic, the one screening that had a statistically significant effect on life expectancy was a certain type of colonoscopy, but even in that case the effect was quite small, something like 3 months IIRC. I think the overall take away is that outside of healthy living, do what makes you feel most comfortable. Even if they may not be highly effective, screenings would provide some people significant mental comfort. If you're one of them, more power to you. If you're fine without, then that's also great.

[1] - https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180912133536.h...

Go to a dermatologist and get a mole map. Get your tests done on schedule when you should be.

Don’t smoke cigarettes, or work in a high risk job around carcinogens.

If you run out and get a bunch of random cancer tests, you are basically ensuring that you will get unnecessary and painful treatment for a finding that probably wouldn't have harmed you in the first place.

It's not a satisfying answer, but it's true. The reason most cancers are found late is because there's no effective alternative.

https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3519

Colo , when appropriate , is good but not as a general interest test:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2529486

   defmodule Guess do
      def guess_message(candidate, _count=0) do
        "There are no #{candidate}s"
      end

      def guess_message(candidate, _count=1) do
        "There is 1 #{candidate}"
      end

      def guess_message(candidate, count) do
        "There are #{count} #{candidate}s"
      end
    end