Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jillyboel3's commentslogin

Are you serious? Americans are firewalling websites that contain the word fuck? And you're even too scared to use the word here?

Grow up.

lmao and now you people even flagged this comment. It's amazing how you're all so afraid of a normal word.


Could you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the site guidelines when posting here? Your account has already been breaking them repeatedly, e.g. here and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44030798. We end up banning accounts that post like that, so please don't.

Btw there's no problem with what you were saying about the word fuck*. The problem is with the personal attack/abuse in your comment.

(We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44036364.)

* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...


Which personal attack? You mean calling out americans? How is that personal? You also going to ban everyone here who posts disparaging generalizations about europeans? Because so far you haven't been.

As for

> Are you a shill, a troll or just an upset fanboy?

This is a genuine question, not an attack.


"Grow up", for starters.

> Are you a shill, a troll or just an upset fanboy?

That's a loaded question and easily enough to count as an attack. This is not a close call!


Yeah, americans gotta grow up. "Oh no someone said no-no word!" is hilariously immature. You're reaching to try and take it personally, it was clearly not even aimed at the commenter but at those pearl clutching firewall intel providers they mentioned.

Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_you re "you people"


Ok, since it seems clear that you don't want to use HN as intended, I've banned the account.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.


Have you never been on a 3 week vacation? Or even just a 2 week one with a day before/after where you didn't sit down to read your email? Apple apparently started their freakout after 15 days


where do you think their billions come from?


not paying for a new phone in full does NOT warrant retaliatory action against all of the author's accounts.

block the device, sure. send collections after him for the unpaid amount, sure.

retaliating by blocking all his unrelated, paid for, accounts is yet another reason apple should be broken up. it also doesn't sound like they refunded him for the days of usage that were lost that surely still had to be paid for.


> Home Assistant has support for that remote option, and no others.

It's literally just a reverse proxy. Set up any you like. Wireguard, cloudflare tunnel, caddy with a security plugin, the options are limitless.


I've been running home assistant in docker for years. Just the `homeassistant/home-assistant` image. Don't need anything more. Best I can tell is that the supervisor is for people who just wanted a managed home assistant in a box setup at which point it's fair for the software to take over the system.


Supervisor is more or less required for some pretty critical add-ons.


Such as? Only one that comes to mind is ESPHome, and I run that separately just fine.


NodeRED is a complete PITA to set up outside of supervisor. It requires extensions on both ends, and it passes the auth in a weird way.


I'm running NodeRED and ESPHome in their own docker containers, integrated with home assistant, just fine. Never used supervisor. It's been a few years since I set them up so I don't remember the details but that also means it wasn't anything notable. They've been stable since.


Do you have it embedded in the Home Assistant UI, and using HA user credentials?


I have HA install in container for a few years - not sure what's "critical addon". Some are helpful, but they're easy to run independently.


> Why people try to defend Apple I'll never understand, my guess is some people who own an iPhone have decided that's 'their team' and who wants to see their team lose

It's this. Apple somehow managed to cultivate cult-like behavior in their users, which I've also never understood.


> It's this. Apple somehow managed to cultivate cult-like behavior in their users, which I've also never understood.

Because an iPhone is a status symbol, like a Mercedes, and thus "proves" that you are a better human being. It's literally about people's self-worth.


Because everyone who likes how Apple has made it easy for users to manage their subscriptions and enjoy the overall user friendliness of their products we are thus cultists who just blindly do as we’re told. Maybe some people don’t agree with your views; that doesn’t make them cult followers for having a different opinion.

Edit: fuck I just got trolled. According to jillyboel profile we are all just fascists. And dang is preventing him from spamming his trolls on HN.


There's no law against you overpaying Apple when you could get more value by going off app. If you want to spend $14 for something that's $10 on Epics website, your welcome to do so. Epic will still get their $10, and you can gift Apple $4 for making it easy to cancel your future subscriptions.


if 3 posts every hour before getting rate limited is spamming sure


> I would also not want to do business with Epic

So don't put yourself in the position where you have to do business with Epic, like forcing them to use your store to get software on the platform over a billion users use.

Apple could easily just do what various courts have ordered them to do: Open up the ecosystem and allow anyone to distribute apps. This has the added benefit of allowing apple to stop doing business with the entities they don't like, because they are no longer involving themselves in a transaction between the user and the business the user has chosen.

It will also save their executives from a prison sentence if they keep this up.


No, apple is clearly the evil one. They are bullying many, many, many other companies and individiuals in a similar, and often even worse, fashion. Those don't speak up because they're afraid of Apple's wrath. Thankfully Epic did have the balls to stand up, and now various various legal entities are forcing apple to make changes that benefit everyone (except apple).


As a user I love apple products for making payments safe. I can get a refund if the item I bought is not as advertised or I bought it by mistake, I don't need to figure out how to cancel a subscription, it's couple clicks to cancel for any subscription. I don't want apple to allow purchases outside the app as I'm afraid companies will leverage their power to redirect users outside of App Store to bypass those "payment safety" features that do not benefit them and will use fishy tactics to increase their profits.


These are billion-dollar companies using the courts to fight over who gets a bigger slice of the pie. They are not your friends or allies.


I trust Sweeney’s intentions far, far more than I do Cook’s. The man is a bona fide hacker from the trenches and does not hide his true feelings behind a corporate firewall.


Wanna buy a bridge?

When was the last time you heard Sweeney admit they target dark patterns at children?


Not that it's an excuse, but industry darling Gabe Newell has engaged in similar dark patterns since well before Fortnite[1]. Yet, for some reason, there's not a lot of "fuck Newell" people out there.

To be frank, I think this is an issue people only opportunistically care about.

[1]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonwosborne/2023/05/25/how-lo...


Sweeney is an ally to anyone who wants to freely distribute software.


Of course not, but resulting changes to Apple's policy are still a good thing for everyone else. Anything that forces apple to bully other organizations and people less is a good thing.


Epic broke the terms they agreed to, filed the lawsuit, launched an advertising and PR campaign to support it, and continue to make whiny complaints after they got what they asked for, but Apple are the bullies here? I'm not convinced.


Terms that were illegal and thus not binding in many jurisdictions. If I were to write: "By replying to this comment you agree to my Terms of Service which require you to paypal me 10k", you would laugh and disregard it. Same thing.

Anyway, just look at how apple forced their payment service so they can take a 30% cut of every transaction made by any iPhone user. Then they banned price differences between Apple's own payment service and external, cheaper, ones. This forces companies to raise their prices by 30% everywhere. So we're all paying more to fund apple's greed. This is just one example of many, and you have to look beyond the apple vs epic fight since that is just the most public instance. Apple are the bullies.

Apple are involving themselves in business between their customers and companies those users have chosen to use. Apple are the bullies.


Yeah, so like I said, Epic got what they asked for. Why are they still complaining?


Re-read the post we're commenting on please.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: