Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | implements's commentslogin

I’m right handed, but eat with the fork in my right hand and knife in the left.

Is the issue that people have difficulty cutting with their left hand? Because if you can the process of eating is pretty efficient: hold with fork, cut with knife, move food on fork to mouth …


I'm in Europe and I did the same as a child because it just felt the most natural. But you better believe our teachers in school would try to force the opposite. The argument was that imagine if everyone cuts with their right hand, but then you cut with your left and cause a lot of annoyance by bumping your elbow info your table neighbor's elbow.

Absolutely a non-issue in reality obviously. But nowadays I do hold my cutlery "properly" as a result. To me it now feels natural to bring the fork to my mouth with the left hand. Or the right one, really, but I default to holding it in the left.


Ahh! Yeah, my teachers were equally unimpressed - but none of them gave the argument you mentioned, which could at least be understood (like elbows on tables).

Yeah, I’ve got a UK Foundation licence but have never actually made a call - it was more of a “have transceiver might as well be legal to use it” thing.

(Also, HF antennas - just didn’t anticipate how difficult they were to set up properly)


Speaking of Linux, OpenBSD’s hypervisor (vmm) supports it so I managed to get docker and containers running on my server via Alpine Linux. Opens the door on all the latest ‘modern server stuff’ running happily on an OBSD box.


Yep. There’s a safe engineer on YouTube who was explaining the history of dial combination locks commonly used for government filing cabinets, etc. He pointed out that you can drill them in minutes but you’d need several hours to make good the damage such that the break in wouldn’t be easily detected. The combined time is therefore the ‘strength’ of the security. (Also, why it might be a good idea to have open sensors on safes, cabinets, etc)


Not sure if you're referring to DeviantOllam or someone else, but here is his awesome talk on safes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Z_Jv7vuiqg

He is a great source of knowledge on physical security for laymen and professionals alike, and leaves an impression of an extremely amicable and well-rounded human being.


Cloudflare aren’t a bad registrar (imo) - they sell and renew domains at wholesale cost, forward emails, can do website landing pages with a Worker (etc). Understand the product in depth and would seem like a reasonably safe bet. (Not shilling for them, just personal experience).


Cloudflare does not allow you to use other nameservers. That makes them a bad registrar since they forbid using a different service for a unrelated thing.


You can roll your own email if you can get your head around setting up an OpenBSD box and configuring OpenSMTPD and the correct domain DNS records - but the issue will be email deliverability. Gmail etc are going to treat as spam most emails that turn up from a residential or VPS linked IP address.

Personal email servers will communicate with each other happily but you need a middleman one for important recipients if you want to be sure it gets into an inbox.


Having hosted a small mail server for friends for over a decade now, I can only think of this as a myth.

Gmail has specific bulk (!) sender requirements, which to my knowledge don’t include a blanket downranking of residential and „VPS“ IPs (the latter are just datacenter IPs anyways). You need TLS, SPF, DKIM, DNS and reverse DNS entries that align, ideally DMARC and that’s pretty much it.

https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?hl=en#zippy=%2Creq...

At one point I misconfigured a relay as unauthenticated and we got abused by spammers for a day. We got put on all sorts of blacklists within hours and got our IPs cleared self-service immediately after fixing the issue.

If you just send emails completely unauthenticated, yes they will be blocked.


In my experience deliverability to gmail is not that hard if you configure stuff correctly. You need a clean IP and domain, rDNS and the usual email stuff like DKIM, DMARC, SPF, but not much else.

Also not sure why you would choose OpenBSD and OpenSMTPD unless OpenBSD is your style. For example I run maddy on linux, which is pretty easy to configure.


Don’t want to edit Norm, but a (perhaps British sensibility) alternative is:

“The more I hear about this Hitler fellow, the less I like him”


This was actually the line Norm MacDonald usually used, though he might have had a similar punch line in several different bits.


> My pet idea is to make some use of longwave! […] At 60 kHz the wavelength is 5 kilometres long …

Dim memory from my Ham Radio days that you’d need an antenna length of 1/4 the wavelength, which wouldn’t be very convenient for portable devices, unfortunately.


Only for most efficient transmission. Reception just scales with antenna size, so as long as your transmitter is powerful enough in terms of effectively radiated power, you can make the receiver arbitrarily small.

Many wristwatches are capable of receiving these LF time beacons, despite usually having antennas more compact than several kilometers.


The 1/4 wavelength is derived from the half-wave dipole. It's not necessary to have an antenna that is 1/4 wavelength. It'll probably perform better if it is closer to that size, but it isn't required.


> The UK had an aircraft called Harrier - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrier_jump_jet

Also, the French: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEPECAT_Jaguar which was designed to be useable from improvised runways, hence the extremely robust landing gear.


I remember the Jaguar - a very square aircraft in cross section (as I think of it) and it was a French/British collaboration.

It (Jag) wasn't really about mixing it in the hand to hand combat thing - it was a trainer and a few other things. I remember the landing gear being really long but not robust.


Any device with a Government service (eg NHS) or a Banking app knows who and old the primary user is, so seems the obvious technological solution is some kind of securely anonymous attestation that websites can request from the OS.


This appears to be what Aylo think, essentially:

https://www.aylo.com/assets/files/age_verification_fact_shee...

And I think this is right. If Apple and Google can add a thing that lets us track Covid exposure they can surely figure out secure age attestation.

As it is, you can use your mobile phone for simple age attestation in the UK anyway, since mobile phone companies block adult content by default until they are unblocked, as a parental control measure.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: