Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gvx's commentslogin

What a fun little project! I thought it was going to be the 30 Rock one!


One who thinks "open source" means blindly copy/pasting code snippets found online.


Everyone knows investing in cybersecurity is just wasteful spending!


You could take a look at SELÖVE, a (severely out of date) fork of LÖVE that is intended to make it safe to run arbitrary .love games. (It used to be on bitbucket, but it looks like it's gone? I'm not sure if I have the repo locally :/)

Running arbitrary code was such a problem that I just completely ruled it out for bitser. Instead of serializing functions, you can register safe functions as resources. This doesn't solve the upvalue problem, though.


Cool to see you were inspired by Ser!


Oh wow, didn't expect to meet the author, thank you!


Not exactly. The headline is a bit misleading imho: the article doesn't say that CO2 uptake by plants is up by 31%, rather that new estimates of the CO2 uptake by plants is 31% higher than previous estimates. That doesn't preclude a temporary collapse of carbon absorption (related mostly to forest fires as far as I can tell).


> related mostly to forest fires as far as I can tell

Just trying to parse this - does that mean "a collapse in carbon absorption" actually means "more carbon was produced for the same amount of absorption"?


^ That kind of shallow understanding of health is a large part of what makes RFK Jr. so dangerous.


I work with files every day, and I'm not sure I would have realised I'd needed to save manually with the original MapHub UI either. A web-based interface that looks like that, I expect it to be transparent. If it'd had three icons (the classic blank page, open folder and floppy disk) in the top left, then I'd assume it would need manual saving. (I'm not saying that's what you need to do, just analysing my own intuitions)


The interesting bit is that for years this wasn't a problem. Like for 5 years I got 0 support requests about missing Save. Also web apps were not auto-saving traditionally, many of them still don't do it today.

Update, answered in detail here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42016231


It's very possible that if you showed me the MapHub UI eight years ago, I'd have intuited that I'd need to save manually---I can't tell for sure. I am definitely aware that the way I engage with software nowadays is very different than when I started using computers in the early 2000s, and I don't doubt it is still evolving due to the changing conventions in UI and functionality.


I 100% agree. This has nothing to do with files, but rather with expectations of how web apps work.

Maybe current web apps implement auto-saving with bad feedback, sure, but this factor should be taken into consideration when building new web apps.


With that name I'd expect a tiny implementation of JavaScript.


I was just reading about this https://porffor.dev

> Porffor is a unique JS engine/compiler/runtime, compiling JS code to WebAssembly or native ahead-of-time.


Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/793/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: