I mean, know what you're walking into, but if you have that, then yeah. My family makes me risk averse. No complaints. Happy as is, you can chase after whatever, as long as you're vaguely relevant in the field.
I don't get it. This guy can feel free to not listen to podcasts. It's not killing music by any stretch of the imagination. I still find plenty of bars and restaurants that annoy me with having a local band play that I don't really want to listen to. There really is nothing forcing you to identify and listen to podcasts.
The difference is the supporting documents found by Qualcomm during discovery. Internal Apple documents stated that Apple was actively trying to portray Qualcomm's patents as inferior by going to other providers.
Where does it say that? I've read the article twice now, and nowhere does it say that Apple internal memos tried to say Qualcomm's patents were somehow inferior. What it said was they intentionally licensed less-expensive patents to try and make Qualcomm's look more expensive, but that's the argument I already addressed.
That's exactly what the FTC did during their trial. The FTC lined up QCOM's competitors and had them testify that QCOM's patents were insignificant/inferior compared to their own patent portfolio. I'm fairly sure that this repertoire was in Apple lawyer's play too.
I can't seem to find an article talking about what you just described. Though I'm not sure what the FTC did even matters since we're talking about Apple, not the FTC.
Maintaining checklists in documentation for software design reduces mistakes dramatically. Writing step-by-step exacting build instructions for one of our core products reduced the annoying requests for help I got dramatically.
I don't mind being a bit challenged to increase my vocabulary. But, it seems the nature of this website attracts people that order dry, straightforward explanation of phenomena?
I don't like overly flowery language, but I don't mind a person with a good grasp on language and composition writing a piece that is more than "'A' because 'B' followed by 'C'. The end." Maybe it's a fine line...
Personally I think it could use some more interweaving of commentary compared to current knowledge for context of just how on or off base they were in climatology, archarlogical, and sociological aspects. The Angor Wat example was hillariously bad because megastructure monuments are way more of a southern endeavor. I believe it took until Cathedrals to get anywhere close in Northern Europe - and even then the huge windows had a real purpose - lighting.
Lack of gratuitous size in buildings there makes sense from heating costs alone - let alone sustainable population densities. Why make more space to warm than you need to live or defend? Plus why spend time making grand rock piles when there is winter to prepare for?
This isn't intended as a putdown to other cultures as frivolous- to them there is less reason to prepare excess food which would never get eaten and would probably rot. Why pickle what you can get fresh except for liking the taste - at which point it is mere luxury salt consumption compared to just getting it fresh.
Although I have a bit more tolerance for "multithreaded" topic presentation than most so I may be in the minority when it comes to interweaving.
I don't have much knowledge in the domain, but ... pickling also adds probiotics to foods, I believe.
>Although I have a bit more tolerance for "multithreaded" topic presentation than most so I may be in the minority when it comes to interweaving.
The interwoven-tapestry-that-presents-a-greater-picture-but-is-hard-to-see-all-at-once is one of my favorite styles of writing! When the writing is both focused, but also somewhat vague, and leaves a feeling at the end of a piece...that can feel more powerful to me than a very directed and clear diatribe. The style seems to draw out more of an empathetic, irrational side that feels like 'faith', almost. Annie Dillard and Eliot Weinberger are a couple of authors that put me in this state.
Associations came very late to Mathematica (version 10 if I remember right) and the whole of the tools in Mathematica had to be converted over. The result was incomplete.
I don't know what planet you live on, but there is plenty of publicly owned property that I have no access to. If you think otherwise, just try randomly walking onto a military base that does not allow visitation. You may argue what you feel is morally right, but any actual adult has realized that morally right does not equate to the law.
