And to connect it back to the original post: the moments that make me cringe the most in Grand Designs are the ones where the owner decides, as a cost-cutting measure, to manage the project themselves despite not having prior domain experience. Whereas the author of this article successfully engaged an expert early on, and saw it pay dividends, despite the up front cost.
My interpretation: the paper describes a system that works for a starting concentration of 200 parts per billion, or higher. This is unrealistic because, in real world contamination scenario, you would expect to see a starting concentration of around 1 part per billion.
I've read the book twice, decades apart, and it gave me great joy each times in very different ways.
I can see how this text causes some to experience the opposite of joy.
Both experiences are valid. But like there's not some big conspiracy of people who claim to like this book or this writer as a facade. They say it's great because, for them, it's a wonderful and meaningful experience.
Chrome browser extensions aren't really compiled, though I suppose they can be obfuscated. If you install this extension you ought to be able to find it in your Chrome profile directory and look at the manifest and JS source.
Both the KitchenAid and the Hobart use a planetary action which is not the best for kneading bread. A better idea is to find a small spiral mixer where the bowl rotates and the mixer blade spins in place. I have a Haussler Alpha and it's great for tough doughs, and seems appropriately overbuilt.
Site Isolation launched in Chrome in 2018, but the work started in earnest in 2012 -- see the below check-in. The idea in Chrome dated to before the Chrome 1.0 launch; it was the subject of Charlie Reis's PhD dissertation and he interned on Chrome pre-public launch.
Site isolation proved to be the biggest refactor in Chrome's history, and was one of the motivating reasons for the webkit/blink fork. Making site isolation work touched a huge host of features, since handling iframes out of process has a way of making simple things incredibly complicated.
The example I always gave was: imagine how the "find text in page" browser feature would be implemented. With the entire document in-process, it was a simple for loop. With the document and its subframes sharded across multiple processes, it is now a distributed search problem that requires handling of out-of-order results and stitching them into a traversal order. What's more, to achieve Chrome's security goals, you want to avoid introducing functionality that would allow the [presumed-compromised] process of the outer document to query the contents of the inner document via the find in page feature. So you can't simply do this as a peer-to-peer query between the renderer processes; it needs to be coordinated by the main browser process.
It's not a whole new level. An aspect of Quadro differentiation has, since ages ago, been based on selectively disabling features that the consumer gpus silicon was capable of. It's the same strategy here.
This makes sense to Nvidia because it creates a segment differentiation and will allow them to charge more for the higher hash rate parts.
As someone who walked away from programming two years ago, reading this stirred something in my heart that I honestly haven't felt since quitting. I've been frankly surprised that I haven't had the desire to code in that time, but it turns out I am nostalgic about the times when coding was a fun process of self discovery.
This article gives me the inkling of a way back to get back to there. Thanks to whoever shared it.
Google Chrome (Linux, Mac, Windows) since version 80
Google Chrome OS (Google Chrome OS) since version 80
Chrome 80: February 4, 2020
and as a clarification
When you connect via VPN to the corporate network the DNS queries are not distributes as when you are in the office. You have a X amount of entry points for the VPN which are served by Y DNS servers which is less than the total amount of DNS servers available in the corporate network. Plus the amount of remote users increased vastly, plus the VPN technology used plus the DNS servers used. Not that simple I'm afraid
Also keep in mind that Edge is chromium based now and has the same issue. And is becoming the standard by MS and thus the impact is increased now because of this
Sure, lockdown and increased VPN use makes sense as to why this got painful in march. However I expect GP was quibbling with this part of your statement:
>Furthermore if I remember correctly this "feature" in chrome was enabled in a version which was distributed to our clients maybe a month before the lockdowns so there was little time to see the effect while clients were still in the office
Which claims that the feature was rolled out recently.
