Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | darepublic's commentslogin

I remember my cousin excitedly telling me that his mom had got him Sega Channel. My mind was blown. However it was soon taken away per parental discretion and I never got a chance to visit and play it. Back to Sonic 2, and Eternal Champions.

this has more of an indie gem feel compared to the blockbuster that was stimulation clicker. as others have mentioned it reminds me of scale of the universe flash animation. I think borrowing some ideas from that, including zooming in and out rather than side to side, could have benefits here.

In community college our perl professor was often late. One time he just didn't show up. I remember him once saying something like job security involved writing indecipherable code so none of your coworkers could understand it. There was a tinge of bitterness in his remark. Our exams were essentially obscure perl puzzles where we had to read the code and determine the output, some kind of coded phrase.

Wet code has its own perils too, you know.

Nice essay but when I read this

> But we don’t go to baseball games, spelling bees, and Taylor Swift concerts for the speed of the balls, the accuracy of the spelling, or the pureness of the pitch. We go because we care about humans doing those things.

My first thought was does anyone want to _watch_ me programming?


No, but watching a novelist at work is boring, and yet people like books that are written by humans because they speak to the condition of the human who wrote it.

Let us not forget the old saw from SICP, “Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.” I feel a number of people in the industry today fail to live by that maxim.


That old saw is patently false.

Why?

It suggests to me, having encountered it for the first time, that programs must be readable to remain useful. Otherwise they'll be increasingly difficult to execute.


Maybe difficult to change but they can still serve their purpose.

It’s patently false in that code gets executed much more than it is read by humans.


Code that can’t be easily modified is all but useless.

A number of people make money letting people watch them code.

I vaguely remember a site where you could watch random people live streaming their programming environment, but I think twitch ate it, or maybe it was twitch -- not sure, but was interesting

[added] It was livecoding.tv - circa 2015 https://hackupstate.medium.com/road-to-code-livecoding-tv-e7...


No, but open source projects will be somewhat more willing to review your pull request than one that's computer-generated.

Better start working on your fastball.

I mean, I like to watch Gordon Ramsey... not cook, but have very strong discussions with those that dare to fail his standards...

Back in 2015 one of my co-workers made a 3d platform game out of pure CSS.

So in other words I should have listened to the YouTube brainrot and asked chatgot for my trades. Sigh.

the og lang should have been named coffeescript. Then the coffeescript in our universe could have been named javascript, until better tooling and improvements to the coffeescript spec became implemented by popular browsers.

Next is only good for it's static build, once it drops support for that I'm out.


Yeah but even there, how do you get dynamic routes for static builds?

Is it a failure if we ship the project a year late? What if everyone involved would have predicted exactly that outcome


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: