I wonder if there's any published evidence of this. I've heard the same thing and it /seems/ reasonable but then again it could be folklore. I guess it depends on the company and how expensive it is to fix.
I mean small or /agile/ companies that can repair a bug and deploy right away would have a substantially lower cost than say a large company that needs to have dozens of people approve something before it can be fixed.
I don't run into this folklore very often but it does happen on occasion - I'll file this little tidbit away until its useful in the future. It is funny to think this number hasn't been adjusted since the mid 1970's.
The explosion supposedly occurred at their test facility which probably makes this a not-so-big deal. Sure you don't want to damage (or blow up) test equipment but if you're going to do it, the test facility seems like the best place.
I wonder if Elon will be the one who responds and/or how detailed will the explanation be...?
One thing you have to admire about SpaceX is how detailed / technical they are with their reports, unlike most other companies who just try to move past an incident.
Agreed. One of the other interesting / admirable things about Elon as a CEO is his ability to talk in such detail about his products. I think this is probably more normal for a founder than a CEO, but it sets a high bar for CEOs (and other executives) for them to be able to talk about the very details of the products they are building. Unfortunately I've never had a CEO like this.
I agree. The article makes it seem like Larry is the driving force behind Google and Sergey is just along for the ride (aside from the meetings they take together and the ability to argue out points). Maybe that wasn't what the author intended but it seems like a side-effect.
Anyone else remember this device from Star Wars - The Phantom Menace when Obi Wan Kenobi and Qui Gon Jinn swim down to Jar Jar's people? lol.
If this were real and it isn't - it sounds like a rebreather (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebreather) only several orders of magnitude smaller and without the extra tank full of pure O2.
What's wrong with a half-billion dollar loan from the government to help out building a car company? Isn't that exactly the type of loans our government should be making - ones to companies who create high-paying jobs, become successful and then repay their loans early?
I believe Elon said Tesla will be profitable next quarter excluding carbon tax credits which is the only existing subsidy they get as a corporation. As for the buyers do you really think the $5-$7k credits the buyers get (at least in the U.S. based on the state they are in) are enough that if they were to stop getting those credits Tesla would stop selling all cars? I mean they aren't exactly selling cheap cars. What's $5-7k if you are already spending $70-90k? That's about a 10% discount.
At least Spotify seems to be waiting until local and/or state governments contact them about collecting sales tax. With Amazon now collecting Sales tax on purchases here in California it's probably only a short time before Spotify does as well.
My former company was about 50% distributed - sales, finance, professional services were all in different areas except for development & testing. We were stuck working in the office. Then again we were only a 10 person company so I'm not sure how well that applies. Besides Automattic I haven't heard of any other companies doing this.
