Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aucisson_masque's commentslogin

> This issue is not public, but based on this information we deem it unlikely that Google will do anything about it. GrapheneOS is aware of the issue and are working on a fix.

Good guy Google, as usual.


> Your selfie, document images, and any personal data are deleted by Yoti as soon as your age is checked.

How much of that is true. Did anthropic put it in a legally binding document? not just a website.


So why are we angry about that ? I mean the end result for the users are exactly the same, it matters only for bots.

Google have such a (justified) bad reputation that whatever they do, people assume it’s entishification. I don’t believed it is on that matter.


Aside from the list of current concerns that others have covered well...Google is very good at "boiling frogs". That is, rolling out unpopular things in phases.

This could be, for example, step one in the return of AMP, but with a new twist. Where google conveniently returns the content of your website, without directly sending the user to your website. With whatever changes it chooses to make.


1. It adds extra latency due to an extra hop.

2. It is non-bypassable tracking of every single click.

3. It does not allow you to inspect the URL to see where it goes to before visiting.

4. It breaks the feedback signal of extensions which redirect sites. E.g. Fandom wikis are shit so I have them redirected to equivalent much better wikis like. But now any such redirection has to be done post-click tracking meaning Google still believes I want to see the Fandom site.

5. It breaks extensions which hide certain shit search results based on URL.


It's rather frustrating that after they crawled my website to use for their AI without my consent, and using that AI to slowly strangle my traffic, they're not happy that _other people_ are doing the same to them.

This is what capitalism's all about. Take as much as possible and give as little as possible if you want to win. Ideally, give negative amounts.

>”This is what capitalism's all about. Take as much as possible and give as little as possible if you want to win. Ideally, give negative amounts.”

Your description is vague enough to encompass every system that I’m aware of, from feudalism, through to mercantilism, communism, and capitalism. It may best fit communism and feudalism, both of which are most notable for fostering negative-value-added firms.


I do not understand the type of psychosis which causes people to say that capitalism is communism.

But if someone says "dogs have four legs, and cats have four legs", they aren't saying that dogs are cats.

You do not understand the comment you're replying to either

Personally, I put a lot of effort into writing my blog posts, some of which have been really well viewed by humans. While mine is effectively a "hobbyist" site, it's nice when readers look at other blog posts as a result of reading the original one. Google's approach ensures that readers get a very narrow view of my content, so everybody expect Google loses out.

Privacy-wise, it enables them to track the result you click on.

Also, though more niche, it would make archived search result pages (e.g. on the Wayback Machine) less useful.


I think they always knew what link you clicked on (when most of the web has a ga4 tag on the other side of the link)

You can block Google Analytics with your browser. You can't block needing to ask Google for the URL of the result you want to visit.

If you're that concerned, use another search engine

I have to anyway because google always gives me endless captchas, as my ISP frequently rotates IPs with people who can't behave.

That's just Google not caring about your ISP because you live in the global south. Everyone gets this. US citizens get the exact same problem but Google whitelists their networks.

> because you live in the global south

I don't, but thanks for confidently assuming.


Aside from the privacy concerns and inconveniences this brings to Google users, it matters for users (of services) that rely on SerpApi too. Kagi for example has started showing these goto URLs in search results.

Well, that's rather the point, right? Kagi and other micro search engines sell a product that just resells Google search results while telling people it's a premium product better than Google. Obviously Google isn't pleased about that.

It breaks the social contract of the web. My user agent should be able to tell me where a hyperlink goes without first clicking on it, and perhaps act differently based on that information.

Now, all Google search results appear to go back to Google.


TBF this is more a browser problem than a website problem to my mind. Redirects shouldn't be handled in such a cavalier manner. I should be able to configure the browser to stop and confirm the destination any time the domain changes without direct user interaction.

Yeah. I might be wrong but I think they only served direct links for a relatively short time in their history, early on in the 90's and in recent years with ping, which they used to track clicks anyway. At least half of their history they used either the 302 redirects or onmousedown link rewriting (which was terrible). And I'm not even starting on AMP.

In this case they assume correctly that it is enshitification. A search engine, that doesn't understand what hypertext and the web are supposed to be is shit. There are no good reasons to not have proper links. Whoever creates such websites is having other motives or doesn't know good web development. In the case of Google employees I have to assume the former. They are not acting in the best interest of the users, and therefore enshitify Google search.

Well, I hope ultimately this will lead to even more user loss for them. Fortunately, I myself don't have to suffer due to it, because I degooglified my life.


Well, for one it breaks right click and copy link location.

It's not exactly the same: when in hover over a link, I want to know where it's taking me. I want to know if the URL is pointing to a safe domain.

Google being the cesspool it is, can serve whichever (ad laden) domain that fits their own interests the best.

This is yet another move to remove power from the users.


That’s why you display ads only on the Google search webpages.

It’s been known for decades that third party website are just lost money.

And then, even Google own pages get clicked by bots but this time from competitors so you spend all your budget and they get cheap auctions.


Everyone understand what Sony lawyers are trying to say, and it’s still incredibly stupid. That’s the point.

> The Iran war and SoH crisis has been great for EV uptake

Trump has been the best promoter of electrical vehicle here in Europe.

He 'helped' his Arabian allies twice, first he brought war to their countries and then he made sure that people wouldn't need their oil anymore (at least much less).

With allies like that you don't need enemy lol.


Yeah, people miss that about apple laptop.

Find me another laptop that has everything, even if it's more expensive ! You can't, some have keyboard as good, some it's the display. In best case you got 2 or 3 things but then it goes downhill on the other, like the trackpad.


> Then they just bought my actual cell number from my credit card company

Holy moly, don't you have any law at all to protect people's privacy ?


If you think Walmart buying your digital info is bad, get this: cops and feds are allowed to buy it, too

in the US? no.


> the information that was once given away for free in return for looking at ads is now more valuable sold to llm's who will have the eyeballs going forward.

I don't believe it.


Mac mini aren't that good for home made server, raspberry sure ain't powerful but there are in-between.

Not being able to upgrade the SSD or the ram is a big issue, not so much on a portable laptop.


Out of all of my home servers, the M4 Mac Mini is probably my favorite and runs many workloads even though it sits on a 96 core Epyc server now (needed the massive amounts of PCIe for something else). I was able to upgrade my SSD with a 3rd party one, not that sticking an NVMe drive on one of the thunderbolt ports would have been a bad pick. About the only place it didn't make sense is if you wanted a ton of RAM.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: