Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aaomidi's commentslogin

The upside to rotating roots is:

1. These might need to happen as emergencies if something bad happens

2. If roots rotate often then we build the muscle of making sure trust bundles can be updated

I think the weird amount they are being rotated today is the real root cause if broken devices and we need to stop the bleed at some point.


> If roots rotate often then we build the muscle of making sure trust bundles can be updated

Five years is not enough incentive to push this change. A TV manufacturer can simply shrug and claim that the device is not under warranty anymore. We'll only end up with more bricked devices.


5 years also is a step not a destination

Sounds more like a detour across hot coals that doesn't get us anywhere closer to the destination.

> 1. These might need to happen as emergencies if something bad happens

Isn't this the whole point of intermediate certificates, though?

You know, all the CA's online systems only having an intermediate certificate (and even then, keeping it in a HSM) and the CA's root only being used for 20 seconds or so every year to update the intermediate certificates? And the rest of the time being locked up safer than Fort Knox?


The thing is even the most secure facilities need ingress and egress points.

Those are weaknesses. It’s also that a root rotation might be needed for completely stupid vulnerabilities. Like years later finding that specific key was generated incorrectly.


There are 2 and GTS is also technically free. Just hard to use.

https://ipinfo.io/what-is-my-ip

Here’s one database to check.


There’s more evidence of Israel using Palestinians as human shields than hamas using them as human shields just fyi

Germany took part in a lot of those wars.

Did it? Genuine question. I thought they were mostly prohibited by their constitution (a.k.a. what the Allies thought was best) from engaging in offensive warfare.


That’s not how US secondary sanctions work.

“Legitimate protest”


Is there some good literature to read about lean? First time I’m hearing about it and it seems pretty cool.


Anything in type theory. Lean is fundamentally a strongly typed dependently typed programming language. Start with Haskell and keep going.


I think that person is the owner of the website discussing it too.

He was cited https://the-decoder.com/leading-openai-researcher-announced-...

Where a while back OpenAI made a misleading claim about solving some of these problems.


> you don't hear his name much.

Seems like it's time to say who you did what to, and face the music for those actions?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: