If we're going to imagine breaking the laws of physics and changing our understanding of metaphysics, as a goal.. then moving an object past the speed of light seems to be more likely than identifying what consciousness is, successfully separating it from it's source and then inserting it in a recepticle, across the other side of the universe.
Stupendous amounts of energy would be beneficial to have for literally everything humans do... whether or not we use the tech on space travel.
We have lived (as a species) through cavemen, industrial revolution to the atomic bomb and somehow you're coming to the conclusion that technology progress has to take a weird bend into uploading people to the internet, as if computers havent capped out on that already?
We have never really cared what the universe prefers. We'd still be living 'in harmony with nature' (so to speak) if we genuinely cared what the universe prefers.
I'd rather be the guy who tore up Einstein's map, than some internet electron.
Stupendous amounts of energy would be beneficial to have for literally everything humans do... whether or not we use the tech on space travel.
We have lived (as a species) through cavemen, industrial revolution to the atomic bomb and somehow you're coming to the conclusion that technology progress has to take a weird bend into uploading people to the internet, as if computers havent capped out on that already?
We have never really cared what the universe prefers. We'd still be living 'in harmony with nature' (so to speak) if we genuinely cared what the universe prefers.
I'd rather be the guy who tore up Einstein's map, than some internet electron.