Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you misunderstand what I'm saying.

The spirit of free speech is to protect saying things that are either unpopular or inconvenient to the powerful. Speech that is popular or convenient to the powerful needs no such protection! Even in the most repressive states you can still praise the party or the dear leader.

The truths that we need free speech to find are not the congenial truths, but the inconvenient ones.



Do you think that what is popular today will be popular tomorrow, so needs no defending?


Yes, I do think that whoever is today's top dog doesn't need defending today. The alternative is just using power to crush the powerless which- I mean okay, that's a normal human reaction but I think it is beneath our aspirations as a country.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: